Amul Roger Thapar

How Judge Thapar rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Thapar left this court for the U.S. Supreme Court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Position
District judge
Status
Elevated to Sixth Cir. 2017
Served
2008–2017
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
January 4, 2008
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
Boston College, B.S. (1991); University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, J.D. (1994)
Signed orders read
20

About Judge Thapar

Amul Roger Thapar was a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. Appointed by President George W. Bush, Judge Thapar received a commission on January 4, 2008. Judge Thapar left the court on May 30, 2017 on appointment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

How Judge Thapar decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In King, Thapar remanded because the removing defendants offered assertions rather than evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional threshold.

“simply saying that the amount-in-controversy requirement is met does not make it so.”

Procedural preferences

In Click, Thapar allowed an amended complaint after finding neither equitable reasons nor futility justified refusing leave.

“the Court’s own review of the record reveals no reason to deny the amendment on equitable grounds.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

King v. Household Finance Corp. II
· 2009-01-16
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to state court.”

Turner v. Astrue
· 2011-04-13
Motion for relief from judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Turner’s Rule 60(b) motion, R. 52, is DENIED.”

Brabson v. Floyd County Board of Education
· 2011-07-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant Floyd County Board of Education) Denied

“the Board’s motion to dismiss, R. 14, is DENIED.”

Solis v. Freedom Energy Mining Co.
· 2010-12-22
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the motion to dismiss, R. 35, is DENIED.”

James River Coal Co. Medical & Dental Plans v. Bentley
· 2009-07-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s motion to dismiss, R. 7, is GRANTED.”

Pittman v. Astrue
· 2009-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff Clifford Pittman) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, R. 10, is DENIED;”

Summary judgment (defendant Commissioner) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, R. 11, is GRANTED;”

United States v. Banks
· 2010-04-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant Beverly Banks, first motion) Denied

“the defendant’s motions to dismiss, R. 19 and R. 41, are DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Beverly Banks, second motion) Denied
United States v. Rice
· 2010-04-07
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s third motion to suppress, R. 52, is GRANTED.”

Christensen v. ATS, Inc.
· 2014-05-30
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiffs motion to remand, R. 9, is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Bailey’s Furniture) Moot / procedural

“Bailey’s Furniture’s motion to dismiss, R. 13, is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Laudien v. Caudill
· 2015-02-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant Caudill) Denied

“Cau-dill’s motion to dismiss, R. 22, is DENIED.”

Ellis v. Arrowood Indemnity Co.
· 2015-07-21
Motion to clarify scope of trial (defendant Arrowood) Granted

“Arrowood’s motion to clarify the scope of trial, R. 139, is GRANTED.”

Motion for separate trials (defendant Arrowood) Denied

“Arrowood’s motion for up to seven separate trials, R. 141, is DENIED.”

Green v. Floyd County
· 2011-03-17
Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, R. 85, is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 322 days (N = 5).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 449 days (N = 1).

The five sampled terminated matters involved two personal-liability suits, product liability, insurance, and a habeas petition. Their recorded dispositions included settlement, transfer, dismissal, and judgment on motion.

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Thapar was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of September 30, 2020.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Thapar left this court for the U.S. Supreme Court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.