Amul Roger Thapar

How Judge Thapar rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Thapar no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Position
district
Status
Elevated to a higher court
Served
2008–2017
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
2008-01-04
ABA rating
Well Qualified
Education
Boston College, B.S. (1991); University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, J.D. (1994)
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Thapar decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In King, Thapar remanded because the removing defendants offered assertions rather than evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded the jurisdictional threshold.

“simply saying that the amount-in-controversy requirement is met does not make it so.”

Procedural preferences

In Click, Thapar allowed an amended complaint after finding neither equitable reasons nor futility justified refusing leave.

“the Court’s own review of the record reveals no reason to deny the amendment on equitable grounds.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

King v. Household Finance Corp. II
· 2009-01-16
Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Granted

“it is hereby ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to state court.”

Turner v. Astrue
· 2011-04-13
Motion for relief from judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Turner’s Rule 60(b) motion, R. 52, is DENIED.”

Brabson v. Floyd County Board of Education
· 2011-07-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant Floyd County Board of Education) Denied

“the Board’s motion to dismiss, R. 14, is DENIED.”

Solis v. Freedom Energy Mining Co.
· 2010-12-22
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the motion to dismiss, R. 35, is DENIED.”

James River Coal Co. Medical & Dental Plans v. Bentley
· 2009-07-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s motion to dismiss, R. 7, is GRANTED.”

Pittman v. Astrue
· 2009-03-25
Summary judgment (plaintiff Clifford Pittman) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, R. 10, is DENIED;”

Summary judgment (defendant Commissioner) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, R. 11, is GRANTED;”

United States v. Banks
· 2010-04-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant Beverly Banks, first motion) Denied

“the defendant’s motions to dismiss, R. 19 and R. 41, are DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Beverly Banks, second motion) Denied
United States v. Rice
· 2010-04-07
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s third motion to suppress, R. 52, is GRANTED.”

Christensen v. ATS, Inc.
· 2014-05-30
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiffs motion to remand, R. 9, is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant Bailey’s Furniture) Moot / procedural

“Bailey’s Furniture’s motion to dismiss, R. 13, is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Laudien v. Caudill
· 2015-02-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant Caudill) Denied

“Cau-dill’s motion to dismiss, R. 22, is DENIED.”

Ellis v. Arrowood Indemnity Co.
· 2015-07-21
Motion to clarify scope of trial (defendant Arrowood) Granted

“Arrowood’s motion to clarify the scope of trial, R. 139, is GRANTED.”

Motion for separate trials (defendant Arrowood) Denied

“Arrowood’s motion for up to seven separate trials, R. 141, is DENIED.”

Green v. Floyd County
· 2011-03-17
Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendants) Denied

“the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, R. 85, is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 322 days (N = 5).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 449 days (N = 1).

The five sampled terminated matters involved two personal-liability suits, product liability, insurance, and a habeas petition. Their recorded dispositions included settlement, transfer, dismissal, and judgment on motion.

A historical record

Judge Thapar no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.