Joseph M. Scott Jr.

How Judge Scott rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2001-01-01
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Scott decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A transferee’s defense was strengthened by affidavits and a record that did not connect the known facts to the transfer’s avoidability.

“the Liquidating Trustee has not presented affirmative evidence connecting the dots and demonstrating the attorneys had reason to suspect the Settlement Transfer was a voidable transfer.”

Procedural preferences

A proposed settlement is assessed against likely litigation success, cost, delay, and benefit to creditors.

“The expense of any litigation between the Estate and the Brown Parties would be significant and clearly outweighs any benefit the Estate could realize from such litigation.”

Cautions

Chapter 13 eligibility is tested against the substance of the debtor’s schedules, including facially obvious unsecured portions of scheduled debt.

“Neither the Court nor the debtor is permitted to close its eyes to the obvious, as reflected by the schedules.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Griffin
· 2006-02-06
Motion to declare child tax credit nonestate property (Debtors) Granted in part

“debtors’ motion to declare child tax credit a non-asset of the estate is granted in part and overruled in part pursuant to the well established law of this circuit.”

In re Hurtt
· 2011-04-21
Motions to dismiss (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Motion to Dismiss is SUSTAINED.”

In re Fletcher
· 2011-11-10
Motions to dismiss (United States Trustee) Granted

“Based on the foregoing, the United States Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in the event that the Debtor fails to convert his case to a case under Chapter 13 within 21 days of the date of entry of this Order.”

Burden v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. (In re Armstrong)
· 2007-03-30
Summary judgment (Chapter 13 trustee Beverly Burden) Granted

“The Motion of the Trustee Beverly Burden for Summary Judgment is SUSTAINED, and the Motion of the Defendant The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. for Summary Judgment is OVERRULED.”

Summary judgment (The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc.) Denied
Gilchrist v. United Bank & Trust Co. (In re Gilchrist)
· 2010-12-17

This initial lien-avoidance opinion was retained outside the counts because the court expressly altered it in the later order included below.

Liquidating Trustee of App Fuels Creditors Trust v. Bowie Resources, LLC (In re Appalachian Fuels, LLC)
· 2012-05-21
Summary judgment (Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Bingham Greenebaum’s renewed motion for summary judgment shall be GRANTED.”

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc. (In re Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc.)
· 2002-12-20
Motions to transfer (Shelbyville Mixing Center, Inc.) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the debtor’s Notice of Removal is hereby VACATED and that the debtor’s Motion to Transfer is hereby DENIED.”

Gilchrist v. United Bank & Trust Co. (In re Gilchrist)
· 2011-01-24
Motion to alter or amend (United Bank & Trust Company) Granted

“United Bank & Trust Company’s Motion to Alter and Amend is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Debtors) Denied

“the Debtor’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 32] and Bank of America’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 27] is DENIED and United Bank & Trust Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 30] is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Bank of America) Denied
Summary judgment (United Bank & Trust Company) Granted
In re Brown
· 2012-08-24
Motion to approve settlement (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the Settlement Motion and the Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1 to the Settlement Motion, be and they are hereby GRANTED and APPROVED.”

Draft for Judge Scott with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Scott, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Scott's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace