Jeffrey M. Kuhlman

How Judge Kuhlman rules, drawn from 8 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
Position
district
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
2026-06-18
Education
Kansas State University, B.A. in History; Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University, J.D., cum laude
Signed orders read
8

How Judge Kuhlman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

At summary judgment, Kuhlman required evidence connecting younger comparators to materially similar treatment and rejected conclusions without supporting detail.

“Kasprzyk’s conclusory statements fail to raise an inference that the younger employees were treated more favorably than Kasprzyk.”

When a jurisdictional defect cannot be cured, agreement among the parties cannot preserve a federal forum.

“The parties all but agree there is no jurisdiction.”

Procedural preferences

Kuhlman treats striking an affirmative defense as a demanding remedy and permits factual development where the defense may relate to the controversy.

“Motions to strike insufficient defenses are disfavored as a drastic remedy.”

He expects parties to use standard word-processing double spacing and to request extra pages when necessary.

“the parties use standard double spacing, and not ‘exact 24’ spacing, in all future filings in this case.”

Cautions

A party seeking reconsideration after failing to object to a recommendation must explain the missed deadline and establish clear error or manifest injustice.

“Rundquist has not shown any clear error or manifest injustice regarding the Court’s finding that he failed to timely object to the R&R.”

A complaint must identify a basis for jurisdiction, the claimed injury, and a statutory or constitutional ground for relief; a bare two-paragraph allegation did not survive initial review.

“The Complaint does not identify a basis for federal jurisdiction or for personal jurisdiction over any defendant. The Complaint does not provide any details as to what Conway is claiming or what injury he has suffered. The Complaint does not identify any statutory or constitutional basis for relief.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Joshua Kasprzyk v. The Scoular Company
2:24-cv-02597-JMK-RES · 2026-08-11
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS that Scoular’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED.”

Scott Gregory Rundquist v. State of Kansas, et al.
2:25-cv-02640-JMK-JBW · 2026-07-10
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 16) is DENIED.”

Airbnb, Inc. v. William Tillman
2:25-cv-02702-JMK-JBW · 2026-08-06
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff/counter-defendant) Granted

“Counts V and VI of the Amended Answer and Counterclaim—as well as any claim for trademark misuse—are dismissed with prejudice.”

Motions to strike (plaintiff/counter-defendant) Denied

“The Court denies Airbnb’s motion to strike Tillman’s affirmative defense of unclean hands.”

Motion to dismiss and strike (plaintiff/counter-defendant) Moot / procedural

“THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Airbnb’s Motion to Dismiss and Strike the Answer and Counterclaim (Doc. 30) is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Anthony Tyrone Jackson v. Alexander R. Owens and Philip C. Marley
5:25-cv-03090-JMK-ADM · 2026-07-14
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

St. James Court Homes Association, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.
2:26-cv-02008-JMK-RES · 2026-07-23
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted in part

“THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS that Defendants’ Joint Combined Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Uhlig LLC v. RealPage, Inc., et al.
2:26-cv-02144-JMK-ADM · 2026-08-05
Motion for leave to file excess pages (defendants/counter-plaintiffs) Granted

“THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS that Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Response Brief of Up to 17 Pages (Doc. 54) is GRANTED.”

Victor Rodriguez and Maribell Tineo v. Caleb Miller, et al.
6:26-cv-04016-JMK-BGS · 2026-07-02
Motion for leave to amend notice of removal (defendants) Denied

“ORDERS that Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal (Doc. 16) is DENIED.”

Motions to remand (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“THE COURT GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) and REMANDS the case to the District Court of Lyon County, Kansas.”

Motions to dismiss (counter-defendants) Moot / procedural

“THE COURT DENIES Counter Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion to Remand (Doc. 27), and the Parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Case Pending Closing of Settlement Transaction (Doc. 33), without prejudice, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Supplemental motion to remand (plaintiffs) Moot / procedural
Motions to stay (joint) Moot / procedural
Louis Conway v. Jasmine LeCount McClanahan, et al.
2:26-cv-02514-JMK-JBW · 2026-09-03
Motion for leave to proceed ifp (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s pending Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied as moot.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Most assigned matters remained pending, and the inherited cases that generated early opinions were not a representative terminated cohort.

Draft for Judge Kuhlman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Kuhlman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Kuhlman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace