Dale Emerson Saffels

United States District Court for the District of Kansas district Retired 2002 · served 1979–2002 Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 18 signed orders read

Judge Saffels no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Saffels decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Saffels required evidence capable of supporting a jury finding before allowing an employment-retaliation claim to proceed.

“Because no reasonable jury could find on these facts that the plaintiff was discharged in retaliation”

He ordered an evidentiary hearing when the record could support a claim that counsel gave materially incorrect deportation advice.

“the court finds that an evidentiary hearing is necessary in this case.”

Procedural preferences

He demanded specific factual detail before authorizing criminal subpoenas for pretrial document production.

“the requests must contain the following factual information”

He enforced local fee-motion procedures when movants failed to document consultation and submit supporting briefing.

“A party seeking attorneys’ fees must comply with the requirements of D.Kan. Rule 54.2 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(2)”

Cautions

He dismissed claims when the party invoking federal jurisdiction did not carry its burden.

“the plaintiffs have clearly failed to demonstrate that any of their claims arise under federal law.”

He dismissed a diversity action when the parties shared citizenship in the same state.

“the parties in this case share Kansas as their state of citizenship.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Lazo-Herrera
927 F. Supp. 1472 · 1996-05-29
Motion to order bureau of prisons transfer (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s Motion to Order the BOP To Comply with their Order is denied.”

United States v. Gottlieb
89 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · 2000-02-25
Motion to compel rule 35 filing (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s Motion to Compel Govt. To Rile Rule 35 (Doc. 216) is denied.”

United States v. Daniels
194 F.R.D. 699 · 2000-05-08
Rule 17c subpoena request (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s Ex Parte Motion Requesting Pretrial Production of Documents Pursuant to Subpoenas (Doc. 89) is denied.”

Pry v. Apfel
49 F. Supp. 2d 1282 · 1999-05-27
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiffs attorney is awarded fees under EAJA in the amount of $4,300.00.”

United States v. Corona-Maldonado
31 F. Supp. 2d 951 · 1998-12-28
Motion for evidentiary hearing (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s request for an evidentiary hearing is granted.”

United States v. Rayton
165 F. Supp. 2d 1177 · 2001-04-13
Section 2255 motion (defendant) Denied

“Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 66) is denied.”

United States v. Jones
991 F. Supp. 1264 · 1998-01-07
Motion to withdraw guilty plea (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea (Doc. 95) is denied.”

United States v. Daniels
194 F.R.D. 700 · 2000-06-13
Motion to take deposition (government) Denied

“the Government’s Motion to Take Deposition, Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 15(a) (Doc. 100) is denied.”

Motion to quash subpoenas (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Blackwell, Sanders, Peper, Martin, LLP (Doc. 99) is denied.”

Motion to seal (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s request to seal the motions is denied.”

Vanover v. Cook
77 F. Supp. 2d 1176 · 1999-10-08
Motion for sanctions (defendants) Denied

“defendant’s motion for sanctions under Rule 11 (Doc. 57) is denied.”

Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
911 F. Supp. 1351 · 1995-12-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 64) is granted.”

Motion in limine (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the plaintiffs motion in limine (Doc. 61) is denied as moot.”

Haskell v. United States Department of Agriculture
743 F. Supp. 765 · 1990-07-13
Motion to suppress (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiff’s motion to suppress is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.”

United States v. Storey
927 F. Supp. 414 · 1996-06-04
Motion for continuance (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s Motion for Continuance (Doc. 21) is granted.”

Motion for waiver of speedy trial (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s Motion for Waiver of Speedy Trial (Doe. 30) is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1679.5 days (N = 20).

The 20 located assigned cases filed from 1980 through 1987 were all terminated and are not a career-wide caseload measure.

A historical record

Judge Saffels no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.