Angel D. Mitchell
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Agents Association's Compliance with a Subpoena Duces Tecum (ECF No. 1) is denied without prejudice to refiling in the District of Arizona”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Babakr's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel Defendants' Supplemental Discovery Responses (ECF 107) is denied.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Dreiling's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel (ECF 15) is denied for the reasons stated above.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant FX Logistics, LLC's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution on Motion to Dismiss (ECF 113) is denied.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that InVitria's Motion for Protection (ECF 236) is denied.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that LZ's Motion to Compel Production of Documents (ECF 345) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth above.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 309 days (N = 4).
Median motion-to-ruling time: 1 days (N = 17).
Mitchell handles referred civil matters throughout the District of Kansas, including consolidated discovery and case-management proceedings. The sampled cases span civil-rights and employment disputes, contracts, insurance, fraud, and product liability. In consent cases she presides through judgment and signs dispositive rulings herself; in Keller v. Diversicare, for example, she denied partial summary judgment and resolved place-of-trial and pretrial motions. The duration figures below come from a small mix of referred and consent cases filed after her 2019 appointment.
Put Judge Mitchell's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Mitchell actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Mitchell's own signed orders and cites them.