Angel D. Mitchell
Motion outcomes
Counted from classified signed orders only. Percentages are shown only where the sample is large enough to be meaningful; smaller samples are reported as raw counts.
| Motion for extension of time N = 2 |
Denied: 2 | counts only |
| Motions to compel N = 1 |
Denied: 1 | counts only |
A "1 of 1" is one ruling, not a tendency. Treat small samples as illustrative, not predictive.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Agents Association's Compliance with a Subpoena Duces Tecum (ECF No. 1) is denied without prejudice to refiling in the District of Arizona”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Babakr's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel Defendants' Supplemental Discovery Responses (ECF 107) is denied.”
“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Dreiling's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Compel (ECF 15) is denied for the reasons stated above.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Median motion-to-ruling time: 46 days (N = 1).
Partial docket snapshot, not a full enumeration. Mitchell sits as the referred magistrate on the district judges' civil dockets and is the District of Kansas's go-to DISCOVERY-MANAGEMENT magistrate -- docket shows her presiding over cases formally 'Consolidated for Discovery' / 'consolidated for discovery, case-management and other purposes' with all non-dispositive filings routed to a lead case (e.g. the BP Energy MDL-style group, Lead Case 24-cv-1073; the New Direction IRA group, Lead Case 23-cv-2477; the Crutchfield group, Lead Case 24-cv-2496). Her nature-of-suit mix spans civil rights/employment, contract, fraud, and product liability across the Wichita, Topeka, and Kansas City dockets.