Tim A. Baker
How Judge Baker decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
Baker enforces the Seventh Circuit's concentration-persistence-and-pace hypothetical rule (Varga/Yurt): he recommends remand where the ALJ's vocational-expert hypothetical addresses concentration but not persistence and pace, even on a thin brief.
“the Magistrate Judge recommends Sears's request for remand [Filing No. 17] be granted under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this opinion.”
Baker treats the duty to clarify an inadequate consultative-examiner report as mandatory before the agency may discount the report for vagueness.
“The ALJ should have reached back to Dr. Kadlec to clarify the consultative examiner's report before discounting it for vagueness.”
Cautions
He applies harmless-error review (McKinzey) the other way: he affirms despite an articulation error in weighing a treating physician where that physician's own records (check-box forms, conservative treatment) do not support the severe restrictions opined, and he rejects the Commissioner's post-hoc rationale (Jelinek).
“the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand be denied [Filing No. 19], and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed.”
A generalized claim that arbitration is unfair did not defeat a written vehicle-purchase arbitration agreement where the opponent offered no concrete proof of bias or unfairness.
“Accordingly, the Court rejects Plaintiff's argument that arbitration would not be fair because the arbitration agreement limits her rights.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand be denied [Filing No. 19], and the Commissioner's decision be affirmed.”
“the Magistrate Judge recommends Sears's request for remand [Filing No. 17] be granted under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this opinion.”
“The Court, having found in favor of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and against Plaintiff Pamela Richardson, enters judgment in favor of the Defendant and against Plaintiff. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.”
“For all these reasons, Plaintiff's request for remand is denied. [Filing No. 12.]”
“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's request for remand [Filing No. 11] is granted. The final decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and the case is remanded to the agency for further proceedings.”
“For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motion to compel arbitration [Filing No. 8] is granted. This case is stayed pending arbitration.”
Put Judge Baker's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Baker actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Baker's own signed orders and cites them.