Robert Clarence Baltzell

How Judge Baltzell rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Baltzell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1925–1950
Appointed by
Calvin Coolidge (Republican)
Commissioned
1925-01-13
Education
Northern Illinois State Normal School; Marion Law School, LL.B. (1904)
Signed orders read
26

How Judge Baltzell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Gochenour, Baltzell treated the bankruptcy court’s control over estate assets and creditor distribution as decisive against a separate creditor class action.

“This court cannot collect and distribute funds which are assets of a bankrupt estate. That function rests solely with the bankruptcy court administering the estate.”

Procedural preferences

When considering dismissal in Kingan, Baltzell expressly evaluated the complaint on the assumption that its pleaded facts were true.

“It is the duty of the court to accept as true the allegations of the bill of complaint for the purpose of considering the motion to dismiss.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Shumaker v. Resoner
· 1929-01-25
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“the writ heretofore issued in this cause is discharged.”

Uniform Printing & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
· 1929-04-10
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.”

Ewbank v. United States
· 1929-12-28
Demurrer (defendant) Granted

“the demurrer must be and is sustained.”

Stempfel v. Lowish
· 1931-05-09
Petition for turnover (bankruptcy trustee) Granted

“The state court receiver should immediately deliver all such property and assets into the possession of the trustee in bankruptcy.”

Jabczynski v. United States
· 1931-11-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Whitmer v. Lucas
· 1931-11-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decree of the District Court is affirmed.”

Oliver v. United States
· 1931-12-02
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“There is sufficient evidence to support the finding of the trial court, and its judgment is affirmed.”

Lloyd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
· 1932-02-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.”

Morgan v. Nolan
· 1933-04-07

After trial, Baltzell held federal canned-food labeling regulations invalid as applied to the plaintiffs’ dry-canned peas and directed preparation of a permanent-injunction decree.

City of Louisville v. Babb
· 1934-06-07
Request for permanent injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“The prayer of the plaintiffs for an injunction against the defendant will therefore) be denied”

United States v. Greenwood Dairy Farms, Inc.
· 1934-09-27
Application for preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“The bill of complaint should be dismissed for want of equity”

Application for preliminary injunction (defendant) Granted

“the prayer of the defendant for an injunction, as set forth in its counterclaim, should be granted.”

Armstrong v. Townsend
· 1934-11-16
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“The bill of complaint will, therefore, be dismissed for want of equity.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned Southern District docket records were returned under the three full-name variants searched.

A historical record

Judge Baltzell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.