James M. Carr

How Judge Carr rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Commissioned
January 2, 2013
Signed orders read
24

About Judge Carr

James M. Carr has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of Indiana since January 2013. His chambers are in the court’s Indianapolis Division, where he holds Chapter 13 hearings.

Judge Carr's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Carr, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

Judge Carr conducts adversary status conferences by telephone; hearings and trials, including Tuesday Chapter 13 hearings, are in the courtroom.

“Status conferences in adversary proceedings will be conducted telephonically. Hearings and trials will be conducted in the courtroom, including chapter 13 hearings which are held at 1:00 p.m. on Tuesdays.”

Conferences

Ask Judge Carr’s courtroom deputy or chambers staff for case-specific telephonic participation in a hearing set for the courtroom.

“Requests for telephonic participation in matters to be heard in the courtroom may be directed to Judge Carr's courtroom deputy or chambers staff.”

Trial

A lawyer participating by telephone may not examine or cross-examine witnesses.

“Examination or cross examination of witnesses by an attorney participating by telephone is not permitted.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Carr decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A party seeking summary judgment must eliminate genuine factual disputes rather than rely on the existence of a prior default judgment.

“Summary judgment is not appropriate at this time. Genuine issues of material fact, as outlined above, exist.”

Procedural preferences

A dismissal ruling may preserve the claimant’s ability to pursue the dispute in another forum when bankruptcy jurisdiction is absent.

“the claims asserted against Bank are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE such that Debtor may pursue such claims in a court of competent jurisdiction”

Cautions

Creditors and government units need reliable systems that promptly stop collection activity after learning of a bankruptcy filing.

“Had IDR communicated clearly with MCSD promptly after the June 15, 2018 petition date that Debtor had commenced a bankruptcy and that MCSD should withdraw all levies and instruct all banks not to act on levies previously issued, then the damage to Debtor would have been avoided.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ghosh v. Clary-Ghosh
11-12876 / 12-50022 · 2013-10-01
Adversary complaint objecting to discharge (Michael Ghosh) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s action under § 727 is hereby DISMISSED.”

Motion to set aside partial summary judgment (Michael Ghosh) Denied

“Plaintiff’s request that the Court set aside the Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024, is hereby DENIED.”

Easy Guy Auto Sales, Inc. v. Frisby
12-01989 / 12-50173 · 2013-03-29
Adversary complaint to determine nondischargeability (Easy Guy Auto Sales, Inc.) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Judgment Debt is DISCHARGEABLE. The Court will enter judgment in favor of the Defendants.”

Fujawa v. Lakey
10-14922 / 12-50217 · 2013-08-01
Summary judgment (Ellen K. Fujawa, chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the Court DENIES the Trustee’s Motion and GRANTS the Defendant’s Motion.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (Ione M. Lakey) Granted
Fecek v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
12-13062 / 13-50089 · 2014-03-31
Adversary complaint to determine student loan dischargeability (Lori Ann Fecek) Granted in part

“partial judgment be and hereby is entered in favor of Fecek and against Sallie Mae. Fecek is ordered to pay to Sallie Mae $500.00 per month for 180 months commencing in September 2014 toward the student loan debt. Any amount of the debt in excess of this amount is DISCHARGEABLE.”

In re Cinda Suzanne Dior
13-05141 · 2017-04-14
Motion for hardship discharge (Cinda Suzanne Dior) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Debtor’s Motion is GRANTED.”

Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Burge
14-05590 / 14-50174 · 2015-12-16
Adversary complaint to determine nondischargeability (Indiana Department of Workforce Development) Granted in part

“judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff as to the Plaintiff’s 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) claim. Judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant as to the Plaintiff’s 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7) claim”

Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Burge
14-05590 / 14-50174 · 2015-12-17
Motion for reconsideration (Richard Lee Burge) Denied

“Although there may be additional reasons for denial, including issues of state law, the Court DENIES the Motion based on the reasons described in this order.”

Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. Burge
14-05590 / 14-50174 · 2016-03-15
Motion for reconsideration (Indiana Department of Workforce Development) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is DENIED.”

Hunt v. Spencer
16-02175 / 16-50172 · 2017-02-24
Summary judgment (Dennis Hunt) Denied

“Therefore, the Court DENIES the Motion.”

Renner v. U.S. Bank National Association
11-02559 / 16-50180 · 2017-10-20
Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (U.S. Bank National Association) Granted

“the MOTION is granted, and the claims asserted against Bank are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE”

In re Annahstaciah Lynn Boykins
17-08957 · 2019-09-17
Objection to confirmation of plan (Arbor Village Homeowners Association, Inc.) Granted in part

“SUSTAINS IN PART AND OVERRULES IN PART the Objection.”

Diaz v. Castillo
17-08377 / 18-50017 · 2018-04-04
Motions to dismiss (Mireya Castillo) Denied

“having determined that Plaintiffs have stated a plausible claim upon which relief can be granted, and being otherwise duly advised, now DENIES the Motion.”

Draft for Judge Carr with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Carr, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Carr's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace