Michael Stephen Kanne

How Judge Kanne rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Kanne no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1982–2022
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1982-02-09
Education
Indiana University, B.S. (1962); Indiana University School of Law—Bloomington (now Maurer School of Law), J.D. (1968)
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Kanne decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Beach, Kanne focused the special-employer inquiry on practical control over how the work was performed.

“Under Indiana law, the ‘real and decisive’ test for the existence of a master-servant relationship is ‘the right to command the act and to direct and control the means, manner or method of performance.’”

Procedural preferences

In Motley, Kanne protected counsel’s recorded witness interview where it revealed mental impressions and no sufficient basis overcame work-product protection.

“The interview of Myron Johnson is protected by the work product doctrine and the defendant cannot prevail in its request for production.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Barber
· 1982-06-07
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“the defendant’s motion for a new trial is hereby DENIED.”

Beach v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
· 1982-07-09
Summary judgment (defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation) Granted

“Accordingly, upon the foregoing FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW it is ORDERED that summary judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendant, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, and against the plaintiffs, Jackie Beach and Julia M. Beach.”

Lewis v. Harbison-Walker Refractories
No. 5619 · 1982-07-14
Summary judgment (defendant Harbison-Walker Refractories) Granted

“It is therefore ORDERED upon the foregoing FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW that the motions of the defendants for summary judgment be and are hereby GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (defendant United Steelworkers Local 5619) Granted
Motley v. Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc.
· 1982-07-19
Request to compel production (defendant CBS) Denied

“It is therefore ORDERED that defendant’s request for an order compelling discovery of the video tape or transcript of the Myron Johnson interview by plaintiffs’ counsel is hereby OVERRULED and DENIED.”

Hoosier State Bank v. International Surplus Lines Insurance
· 1982-07-28
Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment (defendant insurer) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the defendant to dismiss, or for summary judgment, be and is hereby DENIED.”

Communist Wkrs. Party v. City of E. Chicago, Ind.
· 1982-09-21
Preliminary injunction (plaintiffs) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction be and is hereby DENIED.”

Kozicki v. City of Crown Point
· 1983-03-28
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is hereby OVERRULED and DENIED.”

Stanley v. Indiana Civil Rights Commission
· 1983-03-31
Motion to dismiss section 1983 claim (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is hereby GRANTED with respect to any claim plaintiff may be attempting to raise under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”

Motion to dismiss for pleading deficiency (defendants) Denied

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint does not contain ‘a short and plain statement’ of plaintiff’s claim is hereby DENIED.”

Trevino v. Pastrick
· 1983-05-20
Motion to reconsider (plaintiffs) Denied

“On the basis of the foregoing findings defendants’ motion to reconsider, filed pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is hereby OVERRULED and DENIED.”

Riverdale Bank v. Dubois (In re Bugos)
· 1983-11-08
Motion for oral argument (appellant Riverdale Bank) Denied

“the court hereby denies the bank’s motion for oral argument.”

Bankruptcy appeal (appellant Riverdale Bank) Granted

“Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the bankruptcy court’s order of March 18, 1983, is hereby REVERSED and the bankruptcy court is directed to restore the Riverdale Bank to its prior status as a secured creditor.”

Wallace v. Duckworth
· 1983-11-22
Petition for writ of habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“Accordingly, petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.”

Gonzales v. Union Carbide Corp.
· 1983-12-20
Posttrial motion (defendant Union Carbide Corporation) Denied

“Based on the foregoing findings the court OVERRULES and DENIES Union Carbide’s posttrial motion requesting the court to: vacate the judgment and dismiss the lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; grant a new trial because of the existence of undue prejudice and passion; grant remittitur or in the alternative a new trial because the verdict of $3,000,000 was grossly excessive; and grant a new trial because of prejudicial error with regard to the court’s ruling on admission of evidence.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned Northern District docket records were returned under the four searched Kanne name variants.

A historical record

Judge Kanne no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.