Luther Merritt Swygert

How Judge Swygert rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Swygert no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Position
district
Status
Retired 1961
Served
1943–1961
Appointed by
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
Commissioned
1943-10-16
Education
Notre Dame Law School, LL.B., 1927
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Swygert decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Swygert favored a liberal application of procedural savings statutes when a narrower reading would extinguish a timely claim merely because it crossed a state line.

“the only proper result would seem to be to hold that the Indiana Journey’s Account statute applies to the present case.”

Procedural preferences

He required compelling reasons and compliance with notice rules before allowing counsel to withdraw on the eve of trial.

“unless there exist most compelling reasons, counsel should not be allowed to withdraw their appearances under these circumstances”

Cautions

Once a worker's voluntary breach triggered contractual discharge rights, Swygert treated the employer's or union's alleged motive as immaterial absent inducement or waiver.

“the motives which prompted the defendants to act within their contractual and statutory rights are immaterial.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bank Designers of America, Inc. v. Farmers State Bank
· 1961-06-14
Motion to withdraw appearance (Fred H. Thoms) Denied

“The motion of Fred H. Thoms to withdraw his appearance as attorney for plaintiff is denied.”

Motion to withdraw appearance (Philip M. Cagen) Denied

“The verified supplemental motion of Philip M. Cagen to withdraw his appearance for plaintiff is denied.”

Vera Cruz v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
· 1961-04-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The undisputed facts as submitted on the motion to dismiss and the applicable legal principles, as I view them, compel the granting of the motion.”

Russell F. Davis, Inc. v. United States
· 1959-02-16
Tax refund claim (plaintiff) Granted

“It is Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff recover from the defendant in the sum of $37,869.26, together with interest thereon at the rate •of six percent per annum from January 18, 1956, and costs of this action.”

Abele v. A. L. Dougherty Overseas, Inc.
· 1961-04-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment should be denied.”

Getreu v. Bartenders & Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union
· 1960-01-19
Motion for temporary injunction (petitioner) Denied

“Because of the aforesaid reasons, I feel impelled to deny the petitioner’s request for a temporary injunction.”

Interstate Dispatch, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
· 1958-11-13
Motions to dismiss (defendants Nolan and Lepak) Denied

“The motion to dismiss of defendants Nolan, doing business as Nolan Stock Yards, and defendant Lepak is hereby denied.”

Puchek v. Elledge
· 1958-04-02
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The motion to dismiss is granted.”

Ein v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
· 1959-05-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“I do not think either paragraph of complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted. However, the order of dismissal shall provide that plaintiffs will be permitted to amend their complaint within a limited period of time.”

Milich v. Schlesinger
· 1957-11-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant's representative) Denied

“It is unnecessary to consider this issue in determining to deny defendant’s motion.”

Sinclair Refining Company v. Atkinson
· 1960-06-23
Motion to vacate and rehear (defendants) Granted in part

“the March 12th order should be vacated and a new order entered which modifies substantially the older order.”

Motions to stay (defendants) Denied

“For that reason the motion to stay must be denied.”

Motion to produce documents (plaintiff) Granted

“It is ordered that the defendants Local 7-210 of Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, and A. F. Schilling produce”

McNamar v. Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad
· 1957-07-16
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“I am impelled to grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment for the foregoing reasons.”

HMH Publishing Co. v. Garrett
· 1957-04-16
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons the defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied;”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“it is held that their actions in effecting a suppression of the magazine published by the plaintiff should be enjoined.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions predate representative electronic case-level dockets. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Swygert no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.