George Noah Beamer

How Judge Beamer rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Beamer no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1962–1974
Appointed by
John F. Kennedy (Democratic)
Commissioned
1962-04-12
Education
Notre Dame Law School, LL.B. (1929)
Signed orders read
18

How Judge Beamer decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Gleaners, Beamer treated the government like another secured creditor when its authorized representative supplied information on the asserted lien.

“The government cannot enjoy the benefits of being a secured creditor while at the same time circumvent the procedures which protect the rights of other parties.”

Procedural preferences

In First National Bank, Beamer confined review of the Comptroller’s branch-bank decision to the material presented to the agency.

“the reviewing court is limited to consideration of the record presented to the administrative agency in making its determination on the agency action.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Save More of Gary, Inc. v. United States
· 1970-01-13
Summary judgment (defendant United States) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Holbrook v. Ramsey
· 1966-05-04
Motions to dismiss (defendant Clifford Ramsey) Granted

“defendant Clifford Ramsey’s motion to dismiss the present complaint must be granted.”

Gross v. Celebrezze
· 1965-08-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) Granted

“the Secretary’s Motion to Dismiss should be granted and the complaint dismissed.”

Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Co.
· 1963-03-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff union) Granted

“The Motion of the plaintiff for Summary Judgment as to Paragraph I of the amended complaint is granted.”

Summary judgment (defendant employer on Paragraph I) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for Summary Judgment as to Paragraph I of the amended complaint is denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant employer on Paragraph II) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Paragraph II of the amended complaint is denied.”

Hickman v. Western Heating & Air Conditioning Co.
· 1962-08-01
Motions to dismiss (defendants employers) Granted

“this action must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

United States v. Lake County Farm Bureau Co-Operative Ass'n
· 1962-06-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant cooperative) Granted

“the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss must be sustained.”

Kolosci v. Lindquist
· 1969-06-23
Motions to compel (plaintiff) Granted

“The defendant is therefore ordered to pay for the transcription and filing of the deposition of Robert J. Vanderlap.”

United States v. Zakutansky
· 1968-01-12
Petition to enforce summons (United States) Granted

“That said papers should be produced by Zakutansky pursuant to . the summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service”

United States v. Benford
· 1968-02-20
Motion to intervene (taxpayer Fred T. Mackey) Denied

“The petition to intervene is denied.”

United States v. Goodman
· 1970-03-20
Motion to suppress and return (defendants) Denied

“The motion to suppress and return the evidence seized under this warrant is denied.”

United States v. Gleaners & Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.
· 1970-07-06
Motion to reconsider (plaintiff United States) Denied

“Since the Court is of the opinion that the allegations of estoppel do present a valid defense, the government is not entitled to a summary judgment.”

United States v. Robinson
· 1968-07-10
Motion to suppress (defendant) Granted in part

“The motion to suppress, previously granted, is now denied, with the exception of the 12-guage shotgun.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No assigned Northern District docket records were returned under the two searched Beamer name variants.

A historical record

Judge Beamer no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.