Laura K. Grandy

How Judge Grandy rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Grandy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2024
Served
2010–2024
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Commissioned
2010-03-12
Signed orders read
13

How Judge Grandy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A trustee cannot compromise a cause of action after the debtor has exempted it from the bankruptcy estate.

“The Trustee has no standing to settle a claim that is not property of the estate”

Procedural preferences

Reconsideration is not an opportunity to introduce a legal theory that could have been raised before the original ruling.

“Nor should a motion for reconsideration serve as the occasion to tender new legal theories for the first time.”

Cautions

Personal importance cannot replace the statutory inquiry when a debtor claims an exemption.

“the debtor’s feelings cannot be considered in the interpretation of this statute.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Fredman
· 2012-05-31
Motion to dismiss case (United States Trustee) Granted

“As a result, the UST’s motion to dismiss the case is granted pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 707(b)(1) and (b)(2).”

In re Scott, White, and Shewmake
· 2011-08-09
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, the Trustee’s objections are overruled.”

Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied
In re Sykes, McCartney, Turnbull, and Hangsleben
09-31479; 09-30057; 10-30638; 09-30131 · 2011-04-06
Objection to claim (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“Accordingly, the Trustee’s objections in Sykes, McCartney and Turnbull cases are sustained.”

Objection to claim (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted
Objection to claim (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted
Objection to claim (Chapter 13 Trustee) Moot / procedural

“The Trustee’s objection in Hangsleben is overruled as moot.”

In re Hedrick
· 2010-08-17
Motion for reconsideration (Debtors) Denied

“After hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court entered an oral order denying the motion to reconsider, with the instant written order to follow.”

United Science Industries v. Southwest Bank
· 2010-08-03
Summary judgment (Southwest Bank) Granted

“the Court grants summary judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on each count of the complaint.”

Summary judgment (EnviroCap, LLC) Granted
Summary judgment (Banterra Bank) Granted
Summary judgment (United Science Industries) Denied
In re Schablowsky
· 2014-08-28
Objection to claim (Debtors) Granted

“Accordingly, for the reasons stated, the secured claim filed by FLS must be disallowed.”

In re Bullock
· 2019-06-12
Motion to stay pending appeal (Chad Robert Bullock) Denied

“the Debtor's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal absent the payment of a bond is DENIED.”

Motion for approval of supersedeas bond (Chapter 13 Trustee) Moot / procedural

“the Trustee's motion is technically moot.”

In re Edwards and Ticer
13-30230; 14-41167 · 2015-09-22
Motion for instructions (Chapter 13 Trustee in Edwards) Granted

“Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the undistributed post-petition property and wages held by the Trustees at the time of the dismissal of the cases before this Court must be distributed to the respective debtors.”

Motion for instructions (Chapter 13 Trustee in Ticer) Granted
In re Melching
· 2018-08-07
Objection to claim of exemptions (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Trustee's objection to exemptions is SUSTAINED.”

In re Robinson
· 2013-08-20
Objection to claim of exemptions (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s Objection to Exemption is SUSTAINED.”

In re Early
· 2014-12-29
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted

“For the reasons stated below, the Trustee’s objection is sustained.”

Contegra Construction Co. v. Sutphen
· 2013-05-22
Motions to remand (Contegra Construction Co., LLC) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, this Court grants Contegra’s motion to remand this action to the state court and denies the motion of Advance and Mr. Sutphen to transfer it to the home bankruptcy court. In addition, this Court denies as moot Contegra’s motion to strike Advance’s automatic stay violation arguments.”

Motion to transfer venue (Advance Iron Works, Inc. and Robert V. Sutphen) Denied
Motions to strike (Contegra Construction Co., LLC) Moot / procedural

A historical record

Judge Grandy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.