Jacqueline P. Cox

How Judge Cox rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Commissioned
2003-02-03
Education
Cornell University, B.A., 1971; Boston University School of Law, J.D., 1974
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Cox decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

A filed claim is a prerequisite to disallowance relief.

“The Court declines to allow the Trustee to disallow a claim until such claim has been filed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Levey v. Hanson's Window & Construction, Inc. (In re Republic Windows & Doors, LLC)
· 2011-12-12
Motions to dismiss (Hanson's Window & Construction, Inc.) Granted in part

“The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts I-VII is DENIED as this Court has related to jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1). The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count VIII is GRANTED.”

Peterson v. Enhanced Investing Corp. (In re Lancelot Investors Fund, L.P.)
· 2012-10-25
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“For the foregoing reasons the Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to the Counts alleging Preferential Transfers and Constructive Fraudulent Transfers under Bankruptcy Code Sections 547, 548(a)(1)(B), 550 and 544 as well as under Illinois law. The Motions for Summary Judgment will be denied as to the Actual Fraudulent Transfer claims alleged under Bankruptcy Code Section 548(a)(1)(A).”

In re Klaczak
· 2011-07-27
Motion for leave to file adversary proceeding (Stephen J. Wragg Jr.) Granted

“The Motion to Vacate Order of Discharge of Debtor and for Leave to Amend Informal Complaint or Enlarge Time to File Adversary Proceeding is GRANTED.”

Motion to vacate discharge (Stephen J. Wragg Jr.) Granted

“The June 21, 2011 order of discharge is VACATED.”

Jan S. Weinstein & Associates, Ltd. v. Lymberopoulos (In re Lymberopoulos)
· 2011-07-13
Nondischargeability complaint (Jan S. Weinstein & Associates, Ltd.) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, pursuant to section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Court concludes the debt due to the Plaintiff Jan S. Weinstein & Associates, Ltd. in the amount of $26,231.81 plus 9% interest accruing as of August 19, 2008, is nondischargeable.”

Prime LaSalle/Madison Partners, LLC v. Artstein (In re Artstein)
· 2011-08-18
Objection to discharge (Prime LaSalle/Madison Partners, LLC) Denied

“Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant, Steven Artstein, on Counts I and II. The Debtor’s chapter 7 discharge shall be entered herein.”

Malec v. Cook County Clerk (In re Malec)
· 2011-01-04
Motion for sanctions for stay and discharge violations (James and Rita Malec) Granted in part

“The County violated the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a). The County did not violate the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).”

Peterson v. Atradius Trade Credit Insurance (In re Lancelot Investors Fund, LP)
· 2011-06-06
Motions to dismiss (Atradius Trade Credit Insurance, Inc. and Christensen Group, Inc.) Granted in part

“The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, II, III, and IV. Counts V and VI are dismissed without prejudice. Count VII is dismissed with prejudice.”

In re J.S. II, LLC
· 2010-04-09
Motion to enforce automatic stay (debtors) Granted

“The Motion to Enforce the Automatic Stay is granted.”

In re Brace
· 2010-06-25
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s motion to dismiss the chapter 7 case is granted.”

Gander Partners LLC v. Harris Bank, N.A. (In re Gander Partners LLC)
· 2010-07-16
Preliminary injunction (debtors) Granted

“AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION”

In re Sharif
· 2011-03-10
Motion to intervene (Ragda Sharifeh) Denied

“Ragda Sharifeh’s request to intervene herein regarding the July 6, 2010 and August 5, 2010 orders is DENIED.”

In re Dental Profile, Inc.
· 2011-03-31
Motion for rule 9011 sanctions (Nereida Mendez) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court exercises its discretion by imposing sanctions under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 jointly against Dental Profile, Inc., Dentist, P.C., and Husam Aldairi in the amount of $314,536.34.”

Draft for Judge Cox with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Cox, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Cox's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace