Eugene R. Wedoff

How Judge Wedoff rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Wedoff no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Wedoff decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A close reading of the provisions expressly incorporated into plan-modification practice carried more weight than importing confirmation requirements that Congress omitted.

“For three reasons, the relevant statutory language, read fairly, indicates that § 1325(b) does not apply to modification of confirmed plans.”

Procedural preferences

A proposed settlement had to respect statutory priority rules and preserve judicial review of professional compensation.

“Moreover, the proposed allowance of administrative claims for professional fees without judicial review is improper.”

Cautions

Policy concerns about abuse did not justify adding an exception that the statutory text did not contain.

“But questionable or not, a concern about abuse does not itself permit the courts to alter statutory provisions.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Davis
· 2010-12-16
Motion to modify chapter 13 plan (the debtor) Granted

“Because § 1325(b) does not apply to a motion to modify a confirmed Chapter 13 plan, and because the modification proposed here complies with all of the requirements that do apply, the debtor’s motion to modify the plan is granted.”

In re Williams
· 2010-08-18
Motion to dismiss chapter 13 case (the debtor) Granted

“Williams’ request to dismiss her Chapter 13 case must be granted in response to trustee’s motion.”

Birriel v. Odeh (In re Odeh)
· 2010-07-06
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (the debtor-defendant) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, Odeh’s motion to dismiss will be granted as to Count I of the complaint and denied as to Count II.”

In re Mayer
· 2008-06-12
Objection to exemption (a judgment creditor and the Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the objection to Mayer’s claim of exemption is overruled.”

Gecker v. Flynn (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)
· 2011-08-26
Summary judgment (the defendants) Denied

“An order denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be entered together with this opinion.”

In re Redmond
· 2007-12-20
Motion to reopen bankruptcy case (the debtor) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, Redmond’s motion to reopen this bankruptcy case will again be denied.”

In re Johnson
· 2009-01-23
Objection to confirmation (the standing trustee) Denied

“Because the debtors’ plan in this case devotes more than the required amount of their post-bankruptcy income to payments of unsecured debt, the plan complies with § 1325(b) and will be confirmed over the trustee’s objection.”

Levin v. Greco (In re Greco)
· 2008-11-20
Default judgment (the child representative) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, Levin’s motion for default judgment will denied.”

In re UAL Corp.
· 2008-04-24
Motion for reconsideration (the debtor) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, United’s motion for reconsideration will be granted only in part.”

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. United Air Lines, Inc. (In re UAL Corp.)
· 2005-10-26
Summary judgment (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation) Denied

“PBGC is not entitled to summary judgment because there is a dispute with respect to plan termination.”

In re UAL Corp.
· 2004-03-15
Motion to appoint examiner (the Association of Flight Attendants) Granted

“For the reasons set out above, the AFA’s motion for appointment of an examiner has been granted by a separate order”

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of ABC-NACO, Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re ABC-NACO, Inc.)
· 2005-10-13
Motion for judgment as a matter of law (Bank of America) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, the Bank is entitled to judgment under § 1213 of BAPCPA.”

A historical record

Judge Wedoff no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.