Mary P. Gorman

How Judge Gorman rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
September 19, 2005
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Gorman

Mary P. Gorman has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Central District of Illinois since September 2005. Her chambers are in Springfield, and her published procedures cover matters filed in the Urbana Division.

Judge Gorman's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Gorman, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Motions

For a stay-relief motion based on a perfected security interest, attach supporting documents, including recording information for documents that require recording.

“Motions for Relief from Stay which seek relief with respect to property based on a perfected, secured interest in such property must have copies of all documents necessary to support movant’s claim attached as exhibits. Copies of any documents which are required to be recorded in order to perfect a secured interest must include the recording information.”

Motions

A motion to continue a specially set matter must give a specific reason and say whether opposing counsel was contacted and consents.

“Motions to continue set matters must contain a specific reason for the request and state whether opposing counsel has been contacted regarding the request and consents to the request.”

Motions

Do not assume an in-chambers motion has been decided without a court order.

“In the absence of an order from the Court, no party or attorney should assume that a matter has been or will be ruled on in chambers.”

Conferences

Except for emergencies, request a continuance or rescheduling in a written electronic filing.

“Except in the case of an emergency, all requests for continuances or rescheduling must be made in writing and filed electronically.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Gorman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In LPB MHC, LLC v. Farmers State Bank of Alto Pass, she denied early summary judgment because material facts remained disputed.

“The Debtor raised a genuine dispute about the material facts underlying its claims, and the motion for summary judgment can be denied on that basis alone.”

Procedural preferences

In In re One Main Development, LLC, she rejected a motion to alter or amend that offered new context and modified arguments after the protective-order dispute had been decided.

“The Motion to Alter or Amend seeks to wind the clock back on matters already litigated and decided.”

Cautions

In Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Frierdich, she dismissed dischargeability counts that repeated legal conclusions without enough supporting facts.

“More than labels and conclusions are needed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Onken and Boren
26-30084 · 2026-07-24
Objection to claim of exemptions (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“the objection will be overruled and the claim of exemption will be allowed.”

Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Frierdich
25-03024 · 2026-07-21
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Eric J. Frierdich) Granted in part

“The Debtor’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted, in part, and denied, in part, as to Count I and granted as to all of Counts II, III, and IV.”

ACJK, Inc. v. OptumRX, Inc. and Express Scripts, Inc.
25-03011; 25-03012 · 2026-06-10
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Express Scripts, Inc.) Granted in part

“The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.”

Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (OptumRX, Inc.) Granted in part
ACJK, Inc. v. Aetna Health Management, LLC and CVS Health Corporation
25-03000; 25-03008 · 2026-02-23
Motion to compel arbitration (Aetna Health Management, LLC) Denied

“The Defendants’ Motions to Compel Arbitration will be denied.”

Motion to compel arbitration (CVS Health Corporation) Denied
ACJK, Inc. v. Humana Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.
25-03009 · 2026-02-20
Judgment on the pleadings (Humana Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.) Denied

“The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings must be denied.”

In re One Main Development, LLC
23-90402 · 2026-01-16
Motion to alter or amend (Clayton Jefferson Development, LLC) Denied

“For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion to Alter or Amend Order will be denied.”

Legacy Construction Services, LLC v. Segobiano
25-07003 · 2026-01-15
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Defendant) Granted

“For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion will be granted without prejudice. The Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to file an amended complaint.”

In re Weary
17-30503 · 2025-12-18
Motion for relief from stay (FCB Banks) Moot / procedural

“FCB’s Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay was not necessary and will therefore be denied as moot.”

In re Duby
24-90493 · 2025-12-08
Motion to convert case (Steven Dwayne Duby) Denied

“the Motion to Convert must be denied.”

Hughes v. Mims, et al.
25-07011 · 2025-10-31
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Jackson Neal, Curtis H. Seal, Blake Milner, and Emily G. Erwin) Granted

“both Motions to Dismiss will be granted, the complaint filed by Plaintiff David Choate Hughes II will be dismissed without prejudice”

Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Mitchell Mims and MIMS-IPR, LLC) Granted
ACJK, Inc. v. Small Business Financial Solutions, LLC and Rapid Financial Services, LLC
23-03026 · 2025-09-08
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Small Business Financial Solutions, LLC and Rapid Financial Services, LLC) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted, in part, and denied, in part.”

In re LPB MHC, LLC
24-40450 · 2025-07-10
Objection to claim (LPB MHC, LLC) Granted

“Because there is no authority for Farmers State Bank to have filed the claims, the objections will be sustained and the claims will be disallowed.”

Objection to claim (LPB MHC, LLC) Granted

Draft for Judge Gorman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Gorman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Gorman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace