Noah G. Hillen

How Judge Hillen rules, drawn from 15 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
2020-08-31
Education
College of Idaho, 2004; University of Idaho College of Law, J.D., 2007
Signed orders read
15

How Judge Hillen decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Issue preclusion does not establish nondischargeability when the earlier findings leave a required intent element unresolved.

“certain aspects of Defendant’s conduct and leave the essential element of intent unresolved”

Procedural preferences

New arguments raised for the first time in a reply are not considered.

“new arguments cannot be raised for the first time on reply”

Cautions

Professional-fee requests may be reduced when the hours and rates are not supported by the circumstances of the case.

“the hours and rates sought are not supported by the circumstances of this case”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.
24-40158-NGH · 2026-08-13
Objection to proof of claim (Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.) Granted

“the Court will sustain Debtor’s objections to the Cattlemen’s claims”

Objection to proof of claim (Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.) Granted
Objection to proof of claim (Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.) Granted
Objection to deposition designation (Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.) Denied

“the Court finds that Mr. Tuell is unavailable within the meaning of Civil Rule 32 and, in the exercise of its discretion, admits Mr. Tuell’s deposition testimony”

In re Allen
09-00861-NGH · 2026-07-30
Motion for order to show cause for discharge violation (debtor) Denied

“the Court will deny Debtor’s Motion for Order to Show Cause”

Bentley v. Grubb
25-06065-NGH · 2026-07-28
Summary judgment (plaintiffs) Denied

“the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ Motion and enter a separate order”

In re Poline Lender LLC
25-20295-NGH · 2026-06-09
Final application for professional compensation (debtor's counsel) Granted in part

“the Court has carefully reviewed Geile’s time entries and will reduce the requested fee award by $6,688.00”

In re Allen
22-00104-NGH · 2026-06-08
Final application for professional compensation (special counsel) Granted

“Special Counsel is allowed fees of $366,000 and reimbursement of $7,598.79 in expenses”

Objection to professional compensation (debtor) Denied

“The Court will deny Debtor’s objections.”

Rainsdon v. Noriyuki
22-08006-NGH · 2026-06-02
Summary judgment (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“the Court recommends the District Court deny the Motion”

Stewart v. Sengsourinho
25-06045-NGH · 2026-05-06
Nondischargeability claim (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“the Court will dismiss the complaint”

In re Millenkamp Cattle, Inc.
24-40158-NGH · 2026-04-27
Final application for professional compensation (committee counsel) Granted in part

“the Court will reduce the hourly fees to more closely align the fee award with what is reasonable”

Blackhawk Gold v. Muroff (In re Muroff)
25-06046-NGH · 2026-04-21
Motions to dismiss (debtor-defendant) Granted in part

“the Court will deny the Motion with respect to Blackhawk Manager and will grant the Motion with respect to Blackhawk Gold and Blackhawk on the River with leave to amend”

Kurtz v. BMT Capital Group, Inc.
25-06035-NGH · 2026-04-10
Summary judgment (BMT Capital Group, Inc.) Granted in part

“the Court will grant BMT’s partial motion for summary judgment with respect to Claim 1 and will deny it with respect to Claims 2 and 3”

Stehrenberger v. Stehrenberger
20-06044-NGH · 2026-03-25
Motion to extend pretrial deadlines (plaintiff-creditor) Granted in part

“The Court will grant the Amended Motion to Extend regarding Michiko’s deadline to file her Amended Pre-Trial Brief.”

Motion for leave to amend complaint (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“The Court will deny the Motion to Amend because such amendment would result in undue prejudice and surprise to Defendants.”

Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“the Court will deny Michiko’s motion for reconsideration”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 19 (plaintiff-creditor) Granted

“Tamio is liable to Michiko for violating the Utah Uniform Securities Act, Utah Code §§ 61-1-1 to 61-1-206, by selling unregistered securities, and that this debt is nondischargeable under § 523(a)(19).”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 19 (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“Anna is not liable.”

Request for treble damages (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“the Court would decline awarding treble damages in the exercise of its discretion”

Kurtz v. Kalamata Capital Group, LLC
25-06027-NGH · 2026-01-21
Motions to dismiss (Kalamata Capital Group, LLC) Granted in part

“the Court will grant Kalamata’s motion to dismiss Count I to the extent it seeks to assert New York’s usury statute as a sword, but it will grant Trustee leave to amend Count I to clarify the relief sought.”

Draft for Judge Hillen with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Hillen, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Hillen's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace