Merlin S. Young

How Judge Young rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Young no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Deceased
Served
1969–2007
Commissioned
1969-12
Education
Whitman College, 1940; University of Southern California, law degree, 1946
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Young decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

The court followed express statutory remedies even when their policy consequences were controversial, leaving correction of the policy choice to Congress.

“I, however, have difficulty in finding bad faith when a citizen avails himself of a legal remedy provided by law.”

Procedural preferences

General equitable authority did not permit the court to override a specific statutory deadline after a party failed to preserve the automatic stay.

“I cannot utilize the general grant of the powers of a court of equity to authorize the debtor in possession to do something which Congress has expressly considered and limited.”

Cautions

Substantive consolidation required careful protection of separate creditors and could not be used as an informal substitute for an adversary proceeding or involuntary petition.

“consolidation is not only rarely granted but also requires strict attention to the concept of due process.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Swayne v. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission (In re Crum)
· 1982-05-20
Motions to dismiss (State of Washington) Granted

“the motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice to file suit in a proper forum.”

Applegate v. Shuler (In re Shuler)
· 1982-05-21
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 4 (Dorothy F. Applegate) Granted

“I conclude that as a matter of law defendants’ indebtedness to plaintiff is a nondischargeable obligation;”

Motion for relief from automatic stay (Dorothy F. Applegate) Granted

“Plaintiff also seeks and was granted at the time of trial an order vacating the stay of § 362 of the Bankruptcy Code for the limited purpose of allowing the joinder of defendants as parties defendant in a state court action in which plaintiff herein is seeking to recover against defendant’s surety.”

In re Boyer, In re Miller, and In re Kline
· 1981-01-09
Objection to amended exemption (trustee in Boyer) Denied

“If the sums claimed are paid to him, the amendments will be deemed to be allowed in each case and trustee’s objections thereto Denied.”

Objection to amended exemption (trustee in Miller) Denied
Objection to amended exemption (trustee in Kline) Denied
Panhandle Public Employees Federal Credit Union v. Dole (In re Dole)
· 1981-01-09
Summary judgment (Panhandle Public Employees Federal Credit Union) Denied

“I therefore Deny plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.”

Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. Hazen and Reynolds
· 1982-04-19
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 5 (Idaho Department of Health & Welfare in Hazen) Denied

“I therefore find that the debts herein which reflect assigned child support obligations are dischargeable under section 523(a)(5)(A) as it existed on the date the debtors’ petitions for relief were filed and the cases commenced.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 5 (Idaho Department of Health & Welfare in Reynolds) Denied
First American Title Co. v. Design Builders, Inc. (In re Design Builders, Inc.)
· 1981-10-08

The memorandum held that the state period for enforcing perfected construction liens was tolled during the bankruptcy, stating that “the six month period for enforcing a perfected lien under Idaho law is tolled by § 108.” The retrieved text did not reproduce the formal summary-judgment disposition, so no motion outcome is classified here.

Strain v. Valley Bank (In re Strain)
· 1982-01-25
Motion to avoid lien (debtors) Granted

“Defendant’s lien is avoided pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2)”

General Finance Corp. v. Fennell (In re Fennell)
· 1981-02-27
Motion to avoid lien (Lee and Betty Ann Fennell) Granted

“I thus conclude that the lien of plaintiff herein is a voidable lien.”

Fitzgerald v. Union Bank (In re Brimhall)
· 1981-09-08
Summary judgment (bankruptcy trustee) Granted

“Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted”

Summary judgment (Union Bank) Denied

“Defendant’s is Denied.”

Wetzel v. Goldsmith (In re Comstock)
· 1981-11-25
Application for attorneys fees (Goldsmith) Denied

“I thus find no fees can be awarded to defendant Goldsmith in this matter.”

Holder v. Brazington (In re Brazington)
· 1980-03-27
Motions to dismiss (debtor-defendant) Granted

“Counsel for defendants may submit a formal Order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.”

Lewiston Seaport Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Prine (In re Prine)
· 1981-03-09
Plan confirmation (Mary Jeanne and Lorence Allen Prine) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons the plan will be confirmed.”

A historical record

Judge Young no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.