Jim D. Pappas

How Judge Pappas rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Pappas no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2018
Served
1990–2018
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
1990-03-23
Education
Idaho State University, 1974; University of Idaho College of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Pappas decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A proposed estate professional's practical suitability does not overcome the statutory disinterestedness requirement when the professional is also a creditor.

“Debtor’s selection of this accountant cannot overcome the express prohibitions of the Code disqualifying Hansen Hunter from employment.”

Procedural preferences

When intent and credibility are central, the court may allow targeted discovery before requiring a party to defend against summary judgment.

“Plaintiffs have established to the Court’s satisfaction that the discovery they intend to conduct may elicit evidence that will raise genuine issues of material fact.”

Cautions

A fraud claim may be dismissed with prejudice when it remains insufficient after an earlier chance to amend and no additional supporting facts are identified.

“Because Plaintiff was given a previous opportunity to amend, to no avail, and has not argued that facts exist to support the claim in another amended complaint, the Court declines to grant leave to further amend and the dismissal will be with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hopkins v. Nebeker
17-08026-JDP · 2018-02-06
Judgment on the pleadings (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“Trustee’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings is denied as untimely.”

Claim to revoke discharge (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Debtor’s discharge should be revoked under § 727(d)(3) and § 727(a)(6)(A) for his knowing and willful refusal to obey the turnover order.”

Request for liquidated damages (chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“Trustee’s request to retain the $5,000 paid to him by Debtor as liquidated damages is denied.”

Claim for turnover (chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Trustee is entitled to take possession of the Truck, the Trailer, and the Roadstar.”

In re Safe Haven Health Care, Inc.
18-01044-JDP · 2019-07-15
Application to employ accountants (Safe Haven Health Care, Inc.) Denied

“Debtor’s Application to Employ Hansen Hunter & Co., P.C., as accountants for the estate, Dkt. No. 239, is hereby DENIED.”

In re Treasure Valley Marine, Inc.
16-00927-JDP · 2020-10-14
Application for administrative expense priority (Leland Spindler) Granted in part

“Creditors’ administrative expense motions, and their respective priority claims, will be allowed in part and disallowed in part”

Objection to priority claim (chapter 7 trustee and United States) Granted in part
Application for administrative expense priority (David McKitrick) Granted in part
Objection to priority claim (chapter 7 trustee and United States) Granted in part
Application for administrative expense priority (Grant Lungren) Granted in part
Objection to priority claim (chapter 7 trustee and United States) Granted in part
Application for administrative expense priority (KeyBank National Association) Granted in part
Objection to priority claim (chapter 7 trustee and United States) Granted in part
In re Treasure Valley Marine, Inc.
16-00927-JDP · 2021-01-05

The court advised the district court that it would approve the parties' stipulation and partially vacate its earlier decision if the matter were remanded.

In re Cowan
08-02083-JDP · 2018-03-14
Motion for damages and sanctions for discharge violation (Jon D. Cowan) Granted

“Debtor is entitled to recover compensatory contempt sanctions under § 105(a) from Lessor for the reasonable attorneys fees and costs he incurred to enforce the discharge in this Court.”

In re Bianchi
12-02210-JDP · 2018-03-20
Motion for sanctions against debtors counsel (chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“Trustee’s motion will be denied in a separate order.”

Klein v. ODS Technologies, LP
18-08029-JDP · 2019-01-11
Motion to dismiss for improper venue (ODS Technologies, LP) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss for improper venue will be denied.”

Klein v. Peirsol (In re Peirsol)
20-8060-JDP · 2021-10-13
Motion to extend dispositive motion deadline (Wayne Klein) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion to extend time will be granted”

Motion for partial summary judgment (Wayne Klein) Granted in part

“Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment will be granted on these two issues. The Judgment entered in the prior adversary proceeding did not preclusively decide whether Defendant had fraudulent intent when he received the transfers from Chemical, and Defendant specifically disputes that fact in this proceeding. Accordingly, because this material fact remains in dispute, Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied on this issue.”

Lin v. Hunt
20-06015-JDP · 2021-08-17
Renewed motion for summary judgment (Rinaldo E. Hunt and Maile N. Hunt) Granted in part

“The Renewed Motion, Dkt. No. 51, will be granted in part and denied in part.”

Lin v. Hunt
20-06015-JDP · 2020-11-10
Summary judgment (Rinaldo E. Hunt and Maile N. Hunt) Denied

“Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice.”

Lin v. Hunt
20-06015-JDP · 2022-03-16
Motion for attorneys fees and costs (Rinaldo E. Hunt and Maile N. Hunt) Granted in part

“Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees will be granted in part.”

Loewenstein v. U.S. Department of Education
17-6021-JDP · 2020-05-01
Declaratory judgment action (David George Loewenstein) Moot / procedural

“Because Defendant is protected by its sovereign immunity, the Court may not consider Plaintiff’s claims for relief. For this reason, this adversary proceeding will be dismissed.”

A historical record

Judge Pappas no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.