Celeste F. Bremer

“the Court denies Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (Clerk's No. 8), on the state claims for false arrest, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress; on the claim for immunity under Iowa Code 670.4(3); and on the claim for qualified immunity with respect to the section 1983 claim based on false arrest. The Court grants the Motion on the issue of Union County's liability under section 1983.”

“For the reasons set forth below, summary judgment is granted on count III. As for Quick's remaining state claims against DCI, and Musgrove and Daniels, all counts are dismissed without prejudice”

“3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 29) is granted on the following claims: 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 29) is denied on the following claims”

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I and II (federal gender and age discrimination claims) is granted. Plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of material fact suggesting that Defendant's proffered reasons for discharge”

“Vallejo's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is granted as to claims against him individually, but denied as to claims against him in his official capacity.”

“The Court denies Wal-Mart's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.”

“Vallejo's Motion for a New Trial ... [is] denied.”

“For the reasons discussed above, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Clerk's No. 9) is DENIED.”

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 17) is granted as to Plaintiff's claim of discriminatory discharge and as to all claims of individual liability under Title VII, but is denied as to Plaintiff's claims of discriminatory demotion and retaliation.”

“For these reasons, the Court denies Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 12).”

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants GTL's Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 16) on Plaintiff's claims that GTL breached the insurance contract and acted in bad faith in denying the insurance claim.”

“The Court grants in part and denies in part Affiliated FM Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), (Clerk's No. 26). Specifically, the Court grants Affiliated FM's Motion to Dismiss St. Paul's declaratory judgment action, but denies the Motion (Clerk's No. 26) in all other respects, including all remaining claims asserted in Palmer & Cay's and St. Paul's Third-Party Complaints.”

“The Court denies Affiliated FM's Motion to Dismiss VeraSun Energy Corporation's Cross-Claim (Clerk's No. 32).”

“The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 20) is granted; no genuine issues of material fact remain to be determined at trial, and the Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

“Viewing the facts and inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the Court denies Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk's No. 36) for the following reasons.”