Lee M. Jackwig

How Judge Jackwig rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Commissioned
1986-11-03
Education
Loyola University, B.A., magna cum laude, classics; DePaul University College of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Jackwig decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Whether an obligation is support turns on the state court's intent when the obligation was created.

“the crucial question in each instance remains whether the state court intended the award to be a support obligation”

Procedural preferences

The court granted reinstatement where no party in interest had invoked the statutory dismissal procedure.

“no party in interest has requested the Court enter an order of dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section 521(i)(2)”

Cautions

A willful discharge-injunction violation accompanied by disregard for the bankruptcy laws supported compensatory and punitive relief.

“Harding willfully violated the discharge injunction and acted with a clear disregard of and disrespect for the Bankruptcy Code”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Curtis v. Curtis
20-30090-lmj · 2021-08-30
Objection to priority status of claim (Mark Wade Curtis) Granted in part

“the Court enters its decision in favor of Debtor with regard to three portions of Claim 9-3 and to Claim 11-3 and in favor of Defendant with regard to one portion of Claim 9-3”

Objection to priority status of claim (Mark Wade Curtis) Granted

“The hold harmless provision regarding back tax debt is not a domestic support obligation and will be discharged if Debtor obtains an order of discharge in this Chapter 13 case. Therefore Claim 11-3 is allowed as a general unsecured claim in the amount of $7,497.00.”

In re West
12-03377-lmj13 · 2014-04-11
Motion for damages for automatic stay violation (Larry C. West) Denied

“Debtor’s motion must be denied.”

Earlham Savings Bank v. Morrell
11-30032-lmj · 2014-03-28
Nondischargeability claim (Earlham Savings Bank) Granted

“the Bank has sustained its burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that $18,600.00 of the debt in issue is nondischargeable pursuant to section 523(a)(6).”

In re Hopkins
09-05835-lmj7 · 2014-04-01
Motion for sanctions for discharge injunction violation (Jeffrey L. Hopkins and Diane L. Hopkins) Granted

“Harding willfully violated the discharge injunction and acted with a clear disregard of and disrespect for the Bankruptcy Code”

Request for actual damages (Jeffrey L. Hopkins and Diane L. Hopkins) Granted

“entitled to actual damages in the amount of $1,500.00”

Application for attorneys fees (Jeffrey L. Hopkins and Diane L. Hopkins) Granted in part

“the Court will allow attorney fees in the amount of $9,000.00 for the Marks Law Firm.”

Request for punitive damages (Jeffrey L. Hopkins and Diane L. Hopkins) Granted

“punitive damages in the amount of $10,000.00.”

Hattery v. Hattery
11-30003-lmj · 2012-05-11
Nondischargeability claim (Margo Hattery) Granted

“Debtor’s discharge under section 727 does not discharge the $62,641.83 hold harmless debt in issue.”

United States Trustee v. Thrapp
09-30018-lmj · 2012-04-02
Motion to revoke discharge (United States Trustee) Granted

“The U.S. Trustee has sustained his burden of proving that the Debtors’ discharge should be revoked.”

In re Larson
08-04668-lmj7 · 2011-09-30
Objection to homestead exemption (John Krusenstjerna and United Warehousing Corporation) Denied

“Creditors' objection to exemption is overruled.”

In re Braathun
07-00771-lmj7 · 2011-04-04
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Denied

“Trustee's 11 U.S.C. section 707(b)(1) motion to dismiss must be denied.”

In re Pignotti
07-04109-lmj7 · 2011-04-01
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“the U.S. Trustee’s 11 U.S.C. section 707(b)(1) motion to dismiss must be granted.”

Vogt v. Vogt
10-30091-lmj · 2010-12-03
Nondischargeability claim (David K. Vogt) Granted

“Debtor’s discharge under section 727 does not discharge the AmeriCredit hold harmless obligation Debtor owes Plaintiff”

In re Rold
07-04259-lmj7 · 2010-10-15
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“the U.S. Trustee's 11 U.S.C. section 707(b)(1) motion to dismiss must be granted.”

In re Mattingly
03-07434-lmj7 · 2007-06-22
Motion to dismiss chapter 7 case (United States Trustee) Granted

“the motion to dismiss must be granted.”

Draft for Judge Jackwig with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Jackwig, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Jackwig's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace