William L. Edmonds

How Judge Edmonds rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Position
bankruptcy
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Edmonds decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A claimed inability to pay is less persuasive when the record shows voluntary unemployment and realistic earning capacity.

“Luetje is voluntarily unemployed, and thus has failed to prove that she does not have the ability to pay the debt.”

Procedural preferences

Reliance on counsel requires full disclosure of the relevant facts and a reasonable belief that the advice is reliable.

“A defense of advice of counsel may overcome an inference of fraud or willful misconduct, but the defendant must show a full disclosure of all relevant facts to the attorney and a reasonable belief that he was receiving reliable advice.”

Cautions

An oversecured creditor should expect requested legal fees to be tested for reasonableness rather than passed through automatically.

“Section 506(b) is not a blank check for oversecured creditors to incur any amount of legal fees and have them paid by the debtor.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Rothe v. Luetje (In re Wendy Luetje)
97-9109S (97-50441S) · 1998-04-01
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 15 (David Rothe) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Wendy Luetje's obligation to hold David Rothe harmless on the debts to Flex Bank One, National Bank of Iowa, and Gene's Service, as decreed in Equity No. 1889 in the Iowa District Court for Crawford County, is excepted from her discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).”

Fokkena v. Wandvik (In re Kevin S. Wandvik)
08-30106 (07-03766) · 2009-04-02
Complaint to revoke discharge (United States Trustee) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the complaint to revoke the discharge of Kevin S. Wandvik is dismissed.”

Little Family Farms Corp. v. Mortensen (In re Benjamin Alan Mortensen)
08-30042 (07-03965) · 2009-03-17
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 (Little Family Farms Corporation) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), for larceny under § 523(a)(4), and under § 523(a)(6) are dismissed.”

Nondischargeability larceny claim section 523 a 4 (Little Family Farms Corporation) Denied
Nondischargeability embezzlement claim section 523 a 4 (Little Family Farms Corporation) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Little Family Farms Corporation shall recover from Benjamin Mortensen the sum of $33,081.18. This sum is excepted from his bankruptcy discharge as debt for embezzlement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4). Judgment shall enter accordingly.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 6 (Little Family Farms Corporation) Denied
Request for attorney fees (Little Family Farms Corporation) Denied

“The request for attorney fees will be denied.”

United States v. Horras (In re Thomas Michael Horras)
08-30134 (03-02315) · 2009-01-30
Motions to dismiss (Thomas Michael Horras) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint of the United States of America is denied.”

Sherwood v. United States (In re Robert E. Sherwood and Kristy A. Sherwood)
07-30143 (07-03404) · 2009-01-13
Summary judgment (United States) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment is denied. The clerk shall set a telephonic scheduling conference to pick a trial date.”

Community Choice Credit Union v. Forget (In re Norman Ronald Forget Jr. and Wendy Marie Forget)
07-30096-wle (07-00991) · 2008-07-02
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 c (Community Choice Credit Union) Denied

“The claim under § 523(a)(2)(C) will be dismissed.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 a (Community Choice Credit Union) Denied

“claim under § 523(a)(2)(A) should be dismissed.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 b (Community Choice Credit Union) Denied

“The claim under § 523(a)(2)(B) should be dismissed.”

United States v. Holliday (In re Wendel Ray Holliday and Janet May Holliday)
05-30051-wle and 05-30052-wle · 2007-12-06
Application for attorney fees and expenses (Holliday defendants) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the application is denied.”

United States v. Sepell (In re Gary Sepell)
05-30211-wle (04-04939) · 2007-03-12

The interlocutory ruling disposed of two theories but left other issues for trial.

In re Curt N. Daniels
06-01659 · 2007-02-12
Motion to convert chapter 11 to chapter 7 (Hunters Retreat, WSH Properties, and Navajo Associates) Granted in part

“IT IS ORDERED that for cause shown this chapter 11 case is dismissed. Judgment shall enter accordingly.”

Pellett Petroleum Co. v. Bates (In re Douglas Dean Bates)
05-30258-wle (05-07616) · 2007-02-01
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 (Pellett Petroleum Company) Denied

“Pelgrow's claim against Bates under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) will be dismissed.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 6 (Pellett Petroleum Company) Denied

“Pelgrow's claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) will be dismissed.”

In re Curt Nichols Daniels
06-01659 · 2007-01-04

The court conditionally deferred conversion or dismissal to permit a short cure period.

Davis v. Rickabaugh (In re William Porter Rickabaugh)
05-30047-wle (05-00258) · 2006-09-28
Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 2 (Randall Davis, David Mutum, and related companies) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. Judgment shall enter accordingly.”

Nondischargeability claim section 523 a 4 (Randall Davis, David Mutum, and related companies) Denied

Draft for Judge Edmonds with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Edmonds, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Edmonds's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace