Michael J. Bordallo
How Judge Bordallo decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
On equitable tolling of a statutory deadline, the judge treats concrete, repeated warnings the plaintiff received about the correct forum and deadline (not just the plaintiff's subjective confusion or lack of legal training) as decisive against excusing a late filing.
“The Plaintiffs were cautioned twice about where they should bring their FTCA claim. ... The court finds that the Plaintiffs were not diligent in pursuing their claim of negligence or medical malpractice.”
In a hostile-work-environment analysis, the judge weighs how quickly and effectively the employer acted once notified, comparing it directly to how courts have treated employer delay in other cases, rather than resting solely on the offensiveness of the underlying conduct.
“The delayed action by the plaintiff's employer in Okonowsky is in stark contrast to the action taken by the Agency in the instant case.”
Procedural preferences
When a plaintiff's own sworn declaration resolves a genuine citizenship/diversity defect, the judge favors dismissal with leave to amend over dismissal that forecloses the case entirely, even where the original pleading was deficient.
“The court finds that amendment would not be futile, so the Plaintiff should be allowed to file an amended complaint that corrects the defective jurisdictional allegations.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Based on the above discussion, the court recommends that the District Judge (1) grant the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, (2) dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and (3) give the Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to cure technical defects alleging complete diversity jurisdiction between the parties.”
“Accordingly, the court recommends the Chief Judge grant the United States Motion to Dismiss this action without leave to amend because amendment would be futile.”
“Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, the court concludes that no reasonable jury could find that the conduct at issue was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms of the Plaintiff's employment and create a hostile work environment. Therefore, the court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
As the district's sole magistrate judge, Bordallo's own docket is dominated by miscellaneous matters, search-warrant and surveillance applications, material-witness proceedings, and petty-offense/misdemeanor cases, alongside his referral role handling pretrial management, felony proceedings, and reports and recommendations across nearly all civil and criminal cases the Chief Judge is assigned. Almost none of this ex parte investigative caseload produces adversarial, ruled-on civil motion practice; the one contested ruling grounded from his own docket is a twice-filed material-witness warrant application that was denied both times.
Put Judge Bordallo's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Bordallo actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Bordallo's own signed orders and cites them.