John S. Dalis

How Judge Dalis rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Dalis no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2017
Served
1987–2017
Commissioned
1987-01-01
Education
University of Georgia; University of Georgia School of Law
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Dalis decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

An objecting party must present evidence specific enough to place a confirmation issue genuinely in controversy.

“the objecting party has the initial burden of going forward with evidence sufficient to place the issue in controversy.”

Actual notice can defeat a due-process challenge even when service did not meet every technical requirement.

“A party afforded actual notice consistent with constitutional standards cannot claim a violation of its constitutional due process rights simply because the technical requirements for service of process were not met.”

Procedural preferences

A professional's compensation is limited to reasonable value for services that benefited the bankruptcy estate.

“only the 10.5 hours of review benefited the estate, while the remaining 80.5 hours benefited only Blocksom.”

Depositions of opposing counsel require a showing that no other means can obtain relevant, nonprivileged, crucial information.

“no other means exist to obtain the information than to depose Mills”

Cautions

A post-confirmation cause of action that is not estate property should not be added to schedules merely as a precaution.

“Debtor’s motion to amend her bankruptcy schedules is DENIED as unnecessary and improper.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Cardwell v. Bankruptcy Estate of Spivey (In re Douglas Asphalt Co.)
09-51272 · 2012-11-20
Summary judgment (Kenneth E. Futch and Savage & Turner, P.C.) Denied

“Attorneys’ motion for summary judgment is therefore ORDERED DENIED.”

Blocksom v. Brown (In re Brown)
· 2016-08-04
Application to employ professional (Jay Blocksom) Granted

“the Nunc Pro Tunc Application to Employ Jay Blocksom of Blocksom & Blocksom LLC as Asset Recovery Specialist is APPROVED”

Application for compensation (Jay Blocksom) Granted in part

“the Application for Compensation of Asset Recovery Specialist’s Fee is APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,500.00”

Objection to application for compensation (the debtors) Denied

“the Debtors’ Objection and Response to Application for Compensation of Asset Recovery Specialist’s Fee is OVERRULED.”

Jordahl v. Dyal (In re Jordahl)
· 2016-08-08
Objection to proof of claim (the debtor) Granted

“Debtor’s ' objection to claim is SUSTAINED”

SunTrust Bank v. Braden (In re Braden)
· 2014-09-18
Motion for reconsideration (SunTrust Bank) Denied

“SunTrust’s Motion for Reconsideration is ORDERED DENIED”

Statesboro Mall, LLC v. Green (In re Green)
· 2014-01-15
Application for administrative expense (Statesboro Mall LLC) Denied

“the Application for Administrative Expenses is ORDERED DENIED.”

Edwards v. Turner (In re Edwards)
06-20145 · 2007-04-05
Motion for determination of means test compliance (the debtor) Granted

“The Motion is therefore ORDERED GRANTED relieving this Debtor of filing any additional B22 statement.”

Atlantic National Bank v. Glisson (In re Glisson)
08-21449 · 2009-06-19
Objection to plan confirmation (Atlantic National Bank) Moot / procedural

“the objection is overruled as moot.”

Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman & Kenneth E. Futch, P.C. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (In re Douglas Asphalt Co.)
09-51272; 10-05003 · 2010-06-10
Motion for protective order (Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland) Granted in part

“the Motion for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Souther v. Bacon County Health Services Inc. (In re Matrix Imaging Services Inc.)
· 2012-08-22
Jury trial demand (Bacon County Health Services Inc.) Granted

“the parties’ demands for a jury trial are SUSTAINED”

Jury trial demand (the Chapter 7 trustee) Granted
Foreman v. J. Walter Construction Co. (In re Foreman)
01-21400 · 2007-11-26
Motion to amend schedules (the debtor) Denied

“Debtor’s motion to amend her bankruptcy schedules is DENIED as unnecessary and improper.”

Objection to motion to amend schedules (J. Walter Construction Company and Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company) Denied

“Defendants’ Objection is OVERRULED.”

O'Quinn Family Partnership v. 440 Kings Way, LLC (In re 440 Kings Way, LLC)
06-20146 · 2007-02-26
Motion for relief from automatic stay (O’Quinn Family Partnership) Denied

“O’Quinn’s motion for relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362 is DENIED.”

Baxter v. Lewis (In re Lewis and In re Tobias)
05-14070; 05-14078 · 2006-03-27
Motions to dismiss (the Chapter 13 trustee in Lewis) Denied

“the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motions to dismiss each of these chapter 13 cases are ORDERED denied”

Motions to dismiss (the Chapter 13 trustee in Tobias) Denied

A historical record

Judge Dalis no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.