Edward J. Coleman III

How Judge Coleman rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Commissioned
2013-06-28
Signed orders read
18

How Judge Coleman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

At an early stage of a reorganization, practical feasibility can defeat stay relief even before a confirmable plan has been fully developed.

“The test under § 362(d)(2) is one of feasibility, not confirmability.”

Procedural preferences

Professional-employment disclosures must be complete at the outset; later correction does not erase the consequences of a deficient disclosure process.

“Full disclosure under Bankruptcy Rule 2014 is a continuing responsibility throughout the term of employment.”

Cautions

A Chapter 11 filing aimed chiefly at delaying collection against nondebtor guarantors may be treated as an improper use of reorganization.

“the purpose of Chapter 11 is not to hinder and delay creditors’ ability to collect against the guarantors of a failed land speculation investment.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Sterling Bluff Investors, LLC
not stated in reported decision · 2014-08-22
Motion to dismiss case (The Coastal Bank) Granted

“The Court will grant TCB’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Stay Relief in their entirety.”

Motion for relief from stay (The Coastal Bank) Granted
Motion for allowance of administrative expense (The Ford Plantation Association, Inc.) Moot / procedural

“I decline to rule on the Motion for Allowance and Payment of Administrative Expense and Motion to Require Debtor to Maintain Property (dckt. 105) filed by the POA on the grounds that the issues presented are now moot.”

Motion to extend exclusivity periods (Sterling Bluff Investors, LLC) Moot / procedural

“I decline to rule on the Motion of Debtor to Extend Exclusive Periods Within Which to File a Plan and Obtain Acceptances Thereof (dckt. 183) on the grounds that the issues presented are now moot.”

In re Beasley
not stated in reported decision · 2014-12-22
Motion to compel discharge (Joshua and Jennifer Beasley) Granted in part

“it is ORDERED that Debtors’ Motion (dckt. 80) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

In re Bowman
not stated in reported decision · 2016-09-01
Motion to extend automatic stay (Debtor) Granted in part

“the Debtor’s Motion to Extend the Automatic Stay is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.”

Objection to motion to extend automatic stay (William Long) Granted

“Long’s Objection is SUSTAINED”

Staggs v. Kirk (In re Kirk)
not stated in reported decision · 2016-03-30
Motion to dismiss case (Jonathan Staggs) Denied

“Therefore, the Motion to Dismiss (dckt. 63) is DENIED.”

Tippins Bank & Trust v. Jarriel (In re Jarriel)
not stated in reported decision · 2014-09-11
Application for administrative expense (Tippins Bank and Trust) Granted in part

“The Application (dckt. 117) is GRANTED as modified above.”

In re Taylor
not stated in reported decision · 2014-12-18
Motion to retain life insurance proceeds (Gail Taylor) Moot / procedural

“Debtor’s Motion to Retain Life Insurance Proceeds — Amended (dckt. 152) is DENIED as moot.”

Objection to claim of exemptions (Chapter 13 Trustee) Granted in part

“Trustee’s Objection to Claim of Exemptions (dckt. 155) is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part.”

In re Frazier
not stated in reported decision · 2017-03-28
Motion to allow postpetition claim (Barbara B. Braziel) Denied

“the Court will enter a separate order DENYING Braziers Amended Motion to Allow Post-Petition Claim For the Preservation of the Estate (dckt. 48).”

Powell v. Shorty's Used Cars (In re Powell)
not stated in reported decision · 2016-08-26
Request for actual damages (Todd Powell) Granted

“The Debt- or is entitled to recover those fees from Shorty’s pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(k)(l).”

Request for punitive damages (Todd Powell) Denied

“the Court does not find the award of punitive damages appropriate in this case.”

In re Peebles
not stated in reported decision · 2013-09-26
Modification of plan after confirmation (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“the Trustee’s Modification of Plan After Confirmation is DISAPPROVED.”

Tybee v. Coker (In re Coker)
not stated in reported decision · 2017-03-28
Summary judgment (Debtor) Denied

“the Court will enter a separate order DENYING the Debtor’s Motion for Summary Judgment (adv. dckt. 21).”

Boudreaux v. Sheffield (In re Sheffield)
not stated in reported decision · 2014-03-07
Objection to claim of exemptions (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“Trustee’s Objection to Debtor’s Amended Claim of Exemptions (dckt. 60) is SUSTAINED.”

In re Shree Meldikrupa Inc.
not stated in reported decision · 2016-03-22
Motion for relief from stay (Cornerstone Bank) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, Cornerstone’s Relief Motion is DENIED.”

Draft for Judge Coleman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Coleman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Coleman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace