William Truslow Newman

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia district Retired 1920 · served 1887–1920 Appointed by Grover Cleveland (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge Newman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Newman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Newman treated notice, rather than technical perfection, as central when deciding whether a recorded lien should prevail in bankruptcy.

“I think the record of this mortgage was sufficient to give notice to a prudent purchaser”

He followed controlling state law on local taxation while separating an invalid school levy from other lawful taxes.

“The court dislikes to prevent a county from collecting its taxes, but the case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court of the state”

Procedural preferences

He denied rehearing when a party knew its proposed evidence before decision and waited until after the opinion to present it.

“the motion for a rehearing must be denied because of the laches of the defendant”

He required a plenary action, rather than summary bankruptcy process, when a third party asserted a substantial adverse title claim.

“it was not a case for proceeding summarily, but was a case in which a plenary suit was necessary.”

Cautions

He enforced statutory claim deadlines even where a late claimant might otherwise have faced offsets on the merits.

“The whole of the matter is that the claim came too late.”

He refused to strike a pleaded defense before the proponent had a fair opportunity to be heard on the question it raised.

“it does raise, by proper pleadings, a question on which it is entitled to be heard.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Fuller v. United States
· 1893-10-17
Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (witness-payment orders)) Granted

“I am of the opinion that tlie cleric is entitled to recover tills item of $60.45.”

Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (criminal final records)) Granted

“the clerk is entitled to recover that item.”

Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (drawing juror list)) Granted

“The foregoing items, which have been allowed, aggregate $87.45”

Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (entering juror names)) Granted

“he is entitled to charge therefor, the same as he would for writing in any other record”

Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (administering oaths)) Denied

“I do not think that this is a proper charge against the government, nor do I think it can he allowed.”

Claim for clerk fees (plaintiff clerk (separate commitments)) Granted

“I see no reason whatever why this item is not proper, and it is allowed.”

In re Dobbs
· 1909-10-16
Motion for rehearing (bankrupt) Denied

“An order .may be taken reaffirming the order already made in this case, denying the $1,600 exemption”

Blake v. Moyer
· 1913-07-02
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“this application for discharge under habeas corpus must be denied, and the petitioner be remanded to the custody of the warden”

In re Hughes
· 1914-03-18
Petition to review bankruptcy referee (mortgage claimant) Granted

“The action of the referee is disapproved, and the mortgage held to be entitled to proof as such.”

In re Underwood & Daniel
· 1914-05-30
Petition to review bankruptcy referee (trustee) Denied

“I think the referee decided the case correctly, and his action is approved and confirmed.”

In re Webb
· 1915-01-12
Application for exemption (bankrupt) Denied

“In my opinion, the application for an exemption on the part of this bankrupt must be denied.”

In re Trion Mfg. Co.
· 1915-03-08
Petition to review bankruptcy referee (claimant guardian) Denied

“The decision of the referee is approved and confirmed.”

American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Nancy Hanks Hay Press & Foundry Co.
· 1915-03-23
Motion for rehearing (defendants) Denied

“the motion for a rehearing must be denied because of the laches of the defendant”

Georgia Iron & Coal Co. v. Tatum
· 1915-05-05
Motion for injunction (taxpayer) Granted

“I think the injunction should remain in force as to the school tax”

Southern Photo Material Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co. of New York
· 1915-06-26
Request for jury determination (plaintiff) Denied

“It is clear to me that it is the duty of the court to pass upon the sufficiency of this service without the aid of a jury.”

In re Roberts
· 1915-10-27
Petition to review bankruptcy referee (objecting party) Denied

“his action in allowing the claim of the Lamar, Taylor & Riley Drug Company as a secured claim is sustained.”

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co.
· 1916-04-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant railroad) Granted

“the motion to dismiss must be sustained, and a decree to that effect may be taken.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions predate electronic case-level dockets. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Newman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.