Walter E. Johnson

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia magistrate No longer serving 4 signed orders read

Judge Johnson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Johnson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

At 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) screening he winnows claims rather than dismissing wholesale, dismissing a meritless claim (such as intentional infliction of emotional distress) while allowing the plaintiff's remaining claims to proceed.

“Plaintiff Willie G. Smith's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and Plaintiff's remaining claims are ALLOWED TO PROCEED.”

Cautions

On 28 U.S.C. 2255 motions Johnson recommends denial and the district court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

“the Court ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson [62], and DENIES Petitioner's § 2255 Motion [42]. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Moreno-Garcia v. United States
4:14-cr-00028 / 4:15-cv-0175
Habeas petition (movant) Denied

“the Court ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson [62], and DENIES Petitioner's § 2255 Motion [42]. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.”

United States v. Michael Anthony Barr
4:17-cr-00038
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the Court ADOPTS the Non-Final Report and Recommendation of United States District Judge Walter E. Johnson [95], OVERRULES Mr. Barr's Objections thereto [100], and DENIES Mr. Barr's Motion to Suppress [67].”

Smith v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
1:13-cv-04219
Screening dismissal (court) Granted in part

“Plaintiff Willie G. Smith's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and Plaintiff's remaining claims are ALLOWED TO PROCEED.”

State of Georgia v. Jeremy Jermaine Davis
1:16-cv-03937
Screening dismissal (court) Granted

“The undersigned REPORTS that Mr. Davis has not complied with the Order. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this matter be DISMISSED for want of prosecution.”

United States v. Ivan Gregorio Ramirez-Mendoza
4:22-cr-00007
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Defendant's Preliminary Motion to Dismiss for Violation of Equal Protection [20] be DENIED.”

United States v. Roberto Rodriguez-Soto
4:22-cr-00018
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment for Violation of Equal Protection [19, 22] should be DENIED.”

United States v. Jose Rivera
4:23-cr-00005
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Mr. Rivera's Motion to Dismiss Indictment under the Second Amendment [58] be DENIED.”

United States v. Ethan Weathers
4:23-cr-00031
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [15] be DENIED in its entirety.”

United States v. Richard Cornell Brown
4:24-cr-00006
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence be DENIED.”

Motion to suppress (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [19] be DENIED AS MOOT”

United States v. Jason Bradley Patterson
4:24-cr-00002
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [15] be DENIED.”

Marchman v. Smith
1:20-cv-04490
Habeas petition (movant) Denied

“Judge Johnson recommended that Marchman's petition be denied.”

United States v. Jeffrey Alan Bourassa
4:18-cr-00003
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Defendant Jeffrey Alan Bourassa's Motions to Suppress Search and Seizure [523, 527, and 631] be DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge Johnson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.