Newell Edenfield

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia district Retired 1981 · served 1967–1981 Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Edenfield no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Edenfield decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Edenfield treated concrete public benefits produced by civil-rights litigation as supporting an attorney-fee award.

“The benefit accruing to the class on whose behalf plaintiff successfully prosecuted this case is substantial and important.”

He weighed a party's demonstrated need for agency materials against a generalized confidentiality assertion when compelling discovery.

“The court finds further that the plaintiff has compelling reasons to obtain the material sought.”

Procedural preferences

At the pleading stage, Edenfield applied the rule that dismissal required the absence of any provable facts supporting relief.

“A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim can be granted only if it appears beyond a doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts which would entitle him to relief.”

He confined judgment on the pleadings to the pleadings themselves and would not resolve it from an attached affidavit without conversion and notice.

“Under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure judgment on the pleadings can be granted only on the pleadings.”

Cautions

Edenfield would not allow an estoppel theory based on agency conduct to defeat legislation protecting the public interest.

“Estoppel may not be invoked, however, as a means of successfully avoiding the requirements of legislation enacted for the protection of the public interest.”

He declined to expand state municipal liability where doing so would require a federal court to depart materially from settled state law.

“Any decision finding the City liable in this fact situation would require a deviation from settled Georgia law far greater than would be appropriate for a federal court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Arundar v. DeKalb County School District
· 1981-09-22
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“the court hereby DENIES defendants’ motion for want of jurisdiction.”

Ogletree v. Keebler Co.
· 1978-03-09
Motion for sanctions or expenses (defendant employer) Granted

“defendant’s request for expenses is hereby granted”

Hicks v. Communications Counselors Network, Inc.
· 1978-05-08
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is GRANTED”

Hutson v. Sears
· 1970-07-31
Motions to dismiss (defendant retailer) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.”

Lanier v. Internal Revenue Service
· 1971-08-16
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the government’s motion to dismiss is granted.”

Jinks v. Mays
· 1972-11-22
Motion for attorneys fees (plaintiff) Granted

“the court grants plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees”

Stiles v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.
· 1978-06-23
Motion to quash subpoena (Department of Labor) Granted

“the court directs that the subpoena issued to Mr. William Sexton be quashed.”

Brown v. United States
· 1970-02-27
Mandamus petition (federal prisoner) Granted

“Accordingly, petitioner shall be given credit on the federal sentences he is now serving for the time the federal detainers forced him to spend in state custody from April to November 1967.”

Crockett v. Citizens and Southern Financial Corp.
· 1972-09-28
Motions to dismiss (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) Granted

“the motions to dismiss of defendants FDIC and Citizens & Southern are granted”

Motions to dismiss (Citizens and Southern Financial Corporation) Granted
Motion to add party (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiff’s motion to add defendants is denied.”

Saucke v. Federal Trade Commission
· 1971-10-22
Motions to dismiss (Federal Trade Commission) Granted

“defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted”

Request for appointment of counsel (plaintiff) Denied

“The request for appointment of counsel is denied”

Dean v. American Security Insurance
· 1976-06-30
Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED”

Motion to disqualify counsel (defendant) Granted in part

“its motion to disqualify plaintiff’s attorneys is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as outlined above”

Motions to compel (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“plaintiff’s motion to compel is DEFERRED pending supplemental pleadings.”

Brittian v. Belk Gallant Co.
· 1969-03-31
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is granted subject to objection”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings are denied.”

Motion for judgment on pleadings (defendant) Denied

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No judge-specific electronic case timeline was returned for the reviewed tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Edenfield no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.