Linda T. Walker

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia magistrate Retired 2025 · served 2000–2025 16 signed orders read

Judge Walker no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Walker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In criminal cases she issues reports and recommendations on suppression motions that the district judges routinely adopt, recommending denial where the search or seizure was lawful.

“Defendant's Motion to Suppress Search [Doc. 16] and Amended Motion to Suppress Search [Doc. 22] are DENIED.”

Procedural preferences

She treats a motion the defendant fails to brief or pursue as abandoned, recommending its denial on that ground.

“It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statement [Doc. 17] has been abandoned and is also DENIED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Calvin Johnson
1:11-cr-00441
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“This court hereby adopts [26], the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Further, it denies [10], MOTION to Suppress Evidence by Calvin Johnson.”

United States v. Nathan Reed
1:17-cr-00314
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“Defendant's Motion to Suppress Search [Doc. 16] and Amended Motion to Suppress Search [Doc. 22] are DENIED.”

Motion to suppress (defendant) Moot / procedural

“It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statement [Doc. 17] has been abandoned and is also DENIED.”

Pineda-Sanchez v. United States
1:13-cr-00385 / 1:16-cv-3332
Habeas petition (movant) Denied

“Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [181] is DENIED. ... a certificate of appealability is DENIED.”

United States v. Kehbila Lima
1:22-cr-00307
Motion to strike surplusage (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant's Motion to Strike Surplusage [Doc. 21] be DENIED.”

Shavers v. Hamil
1:13-cv-00697
Screening dismissal (court) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker's Final Report and Recommendation [9] is ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSED.”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [4] is DENIED AS MOOT.”

Nunnally v. Head
1:17-cv-03750

Administrative closure of a duplicate pro se habeas filing so it proceeds in the original case; not a merits ruling. Quote: 'IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker's Final Report and Recommendation [2] is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case, 1:17-cv-3750-WSD, be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED ... to avoid duplication and waste of resources.'

United States v. Anthony G. Christou
1:06-cr-00483
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS AS ITS ORDER the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge, and Defendant's Motion to Suppress [18] and Amended Motion to Suppress [25] are DENIED.”

United States v. Demetrius Rushin
1:18-cr-00004
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the Court OVERRULES his objections [Doc. 34]. Finding no clear error in the remaining portions of the R&R, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 32] as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 18] and Supplemented Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. 27] are DENIED.”

Benton v. Hall
1:24-cv-00206
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Benton's objections [ECF 12] are OVERRULED, and Judge Walker's R&R [ECF 10] is ADOPTED in its entirety as the order of this Court. Hall's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely [ECF 5] is GRANTED, Benton's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.”

United States v. Mark Young
1:12-cr-00115
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“The Report and Recommendation (‘R&R’) [Doc. No. 89] is hereby ADOPTED as the order of the court. The Defendant's objections to said Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 92] are hereby OVERRULED. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [Doc. No. 45] is hereby DENIED.”

Robinson v. Intercorp
1:05-cv-01274
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“The court GRANTS Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's sex discrimination, retaliation or state law claims. The court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff's race discrimination claims and gives Defendant leave again to move for summary judgment.”

United States v. Banes and Lindsey
1:24-cr-00195
Motion to dismiss indictment (defendant) Denied

“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motions to Dismiss [Docs. 34, 36] be DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge Walker no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.