Justin S. Anand

“On July 15, 2013, Magistrate Judge Anand issued his R&R recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. ... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand's Final Report and Recommendation [46] is ADOPTED, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [34] is GRANTED.”

“the Report and Recommendation ('R&R') of Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand [Doc. 45] recommending that Defendant's Amended Motion to Disqualify Counsel and to Suppress Statements ... be denied. ... the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 45] as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Amended Motion to Disqualify and to Suppress Statements [Doc. 33] is DENIED.”

“The Magistrate Judge recommended that Movant's Section 2255 Motion be dismissed ... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand's Final Report and Recommendation ('R&R') [43] is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Section 2255 Motion [21] is DISMISSED. ... Movant is DENIED a certificate of appealability.”

“Magistrate Judge Anand recommends that ... Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ... be granted in part and denied in part. ... the Court ADOPTS in part and REJECTS in part the R&R. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] to the extent that Plaintiff's claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act are hereby DISMISSED, and the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] to the extent that all other claims shall be permitted to proceed”

In a pro se Section 2254 matter, the petitioner ignored Anand's order to pay the fee or seek in forma pauperis status and amend on the proper forms. Anand's R&R recommended sua sponte dismissal without prejudice for failure to comply with a lawful order under Local Rule 41.3(A)(2); District Judge Duffey adopted the recommendation and dismissed without prejudice.

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand's Final Report and Recommendation [21] is ADOPTED... National's Motion to Dismiss [6] is GRANTED.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier Levine & Block, LLP's, Motion to Dismiss [7] is GRANTED.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [10] is DENIED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“In light of the foregoing, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [80] is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this action.”

“Thus, for the reasons explained above, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [55] [58] [68] [69] [123] be DENIED IN PART, specifically as to Defendants' arguments that the federal anti-kidnaping statute is unconstitutional on its face.”

“Based on the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Angela Brady-Williams's motion to vacate her sentence [Doc. 155] be DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“For the reasons discussed above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [2] be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety.”

“For the reasons discussed above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion for Summary Judgment [27] be GRANTED.”

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the instant § 2254 habeas petition [Doc. 1] be DENIED and that this action be DISMISSED.”