John K. Larkins III

“the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 123] as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 29] is DENIED.”

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R, [Doc. 164], is ADOPTED as the order of the Court, and that Movant's motions, [Docs. 162, 163], are DENIED as successive.”

“Movant's motions, [Docs. 162, 163], are DENIED as successive.”

“After screening Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim against Defendants Carter and Artis and his excessive force claim against Defendant Escoffery be allowed to proceed. He recommended the Court dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendant Gardner, and that Plaintiff's remaining claims and all other Defendants be dismissed.”

Sovereign-citizen defendant found COMPETENT to stand trial on Larkins's R&R (adopted, plain error). This competency determination did not resolve a party motion.

Final R&R recommended REMAND of a removed Georgia dispossessory action for lack of SMJ (no federal question; no diversity); adopted, remanded. The pro se defendant's IFP appeal/injunction motion (the DJ's own rulings) were denied. The R&R did not resolve a party motion and illustrates his jurisdictional reasoning.

“The Court OVERRULES the objections, ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety as the Order of this Court, and DENIES Grady's motion for summary judgment.”

“I RECOMMEND that Plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal, (Doc. 98), be GRANTED without the imposition of any additional conditions.”

“I further RECOMMEND that Jackson's motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 79), be DENIED AS MOOT.”

“Accordingly the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 38] as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss [34].”

“Redfin's motion to dismiss the amended complaint [ECF 48] is GRANTED, and the instant action is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”

“Daker's motion for contempt and sanctions is therefore denied without prejudice.”

“Accordingly, Defendant's motion to dismiss [ECF 13] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's sole claim of Title VII sexual harassment may proceed; Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.”

“Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [ECF 15] and Plaintiff's motion to strike [ECF 16] are DENIED.”

“Daker's objections [ECF 38] are OVERRULED and the R&R [ECF 34] is ADOPTED as the Order of this Court, except that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants' motion to dismiss [ECF 33] is DENIED as moot.”

“The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Petitioner's habeas corpus petition be DISMISSED for failure to exhaust and on grounds of abstention.”