John H. Rains IV

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia magistrate 2 signed orders read

How Judge Rains decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Denies a habeas petitioner's collateral summary-judgment motions as moot once the underlying 2255 motion is resolved.

“Petitioner's motions for summary judgment, Dkt. Nos. [103, 105], are DENIED AS MOOT”

Cautions

Denies a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion to vacate on the magistrate's recommendation and declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

“the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. [109], as the opinion of the Court: Respondent's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. [91], is GRANTED; Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, Dkt. No. [89], is DENIED; ... and no certificate of appealability shall issue.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Waymon Bryant, Jr. v. United States
4:20-cr-00019-LMM-JHR
Motion to vacate 2255 (defendant) Denied

“the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. [109], as the opinion of the Court: Respondent's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. [91], is GRANTED; Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255, Dkt. No. [89], is DENIED; ... and no certificate of appealability shall issue.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Petitioner's motions for summary judgment, Dkt. Nos. [103, 105], are DENIED AS MOOT”

Julio Martinez-Guzman v. United States
4:23-cr-00026-WMR-JHR · 2026-04-14
Motion to vacate 2255 (defendant) Denied

“After considering the Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. 139], the Court receives the R&R with approval and adopts its findings and legal conclusions as the Order of this Court. Accordingly, Movant Julio Martinez-Guzman's Section 2255 Motion [Doc. 127] is DENIED. Further, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.”

Put Judge Rains's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Rains actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Rains's own signed orders and cites them.