Janet F. King

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia magistrate Retired 2020 · served 1998–2020 3 signed orders read

Judge King no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge King decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On employment summary-judgment motions King parses the claims: she recommends granting the employer's motion on hostile-work-environment and state-law claims while denying it on the tangible-employment-action harassment and retaliation claims.

“The court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King [67-1] as the ORDER of this court. The court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion for summary judgment [36-1].”

Cautions

On suppression motions in a multi-defendant drug conspiracy she holds a hearing, makes credibility findings on the officers' testimony, and recommends denying all suppression motions and a motion to sever.

“the court DENIES all of the defendants' motions to suppress [64] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [86] [87] [103] [108] [129] ... ADOPTS AS MODIFIED the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King, and OVERRULES Defendant Crowell's Objections thereto”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Concepcion Orquiola v. National City Mortgage Co.
1:05-cv-00783-JOF
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“The court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King [67-1] as the ORDER of this court. The court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion for summary judgment [36-1].”

United States v. Sanchez-Tamayo et al.
1:10-cr-00532-JOF-JFK
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“the court DENIES all of the defendants' motions to suppress [64] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [86] [87] [103] [108] [129] ... ADOPTS AS MODIFIED the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King, and OVERRULES Defendant Crowell's Objections thereto”

Motion to sever (defendant) Denied

“DENIES Defendant Crowell's motion for severance of Defendants [105], ADOPTS AS MODIFIED the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Janet F. King”

Richard Lucas, Jr. v. United States
1:13-cr-00114-WSD-JFK
Motion to vacate 2255 (defendant) Denied

“Magistrate Judge Janet F. King's Final Report and Recommendation [49] is ADOPTED. ... Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [45] is GRANTED. ... Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to Section 2255 [42] is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. ... a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge King no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.