E. Clayton Scofield III
How Judge Scofield rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Judge Scofield no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.
About Judge Scofield
E. Clayton Scofield III served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Georgia in its Atlanta and Newnan divisions. His signed judicial work spans at least the late 1990s through 2015.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the ORDER of this court. The court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss [17-1]”
“the Court ADOPTS AS ITS ORDER the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge issued by Magistrate Judge E. Clayton Scofield, III on July 6, 2007 [25]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Travis Cork's Motion to Recuse All Judges ... and Motion to Change Venue [22] and Motion to Recuse [29] are DENIED.”
“the Final R&R is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the Order of this Court. Each of Medina's objections is OVERRULED, and his Section 2255 motion is DENIED. ... a certificate of appealability is DENIED.”
“it is received with approval and adopted as the Opinion and Order of this Court. Accordingly, Mr. Mendoza's Section 2255 Motion is hereby DISMISSED, and he is DENIED a certificate of appealability.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody [614] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition [1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”
“Defendant's Motion to Suppress the out of court identification [401] and Motion to Suppress Evidence [400] are DENIED.”
“The Final R&R [Doc. 158] is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the Order of this Court. Ayala-Castaneda's Sec. 2255 motion is DENIED.”
“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Sanchez's Sec. 2255 motion be DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. foll. Sec. 2255, Rule 4(b).”
“the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Mr. White's motion [Doc. No. 110] be DISMISSED.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [23] is DENIED.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Suppress Evidence [24] derived from his arrest and the seizure of his vehicle is DENIED.”
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion to Suppress Evidence Seized During Transfer [28] is GRANTED with respect to the five pieces of paper seized from Defendant but DENIED with respect to the other property.”
“the undersigned finds that the warrantless entry into Defendant's residence was in violation of the Fourth Amendment and recommends that the motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the warrantless arrest be GRANTED in part, in particular, the motion should be granted to the extent that the statement regarding the car keys is excluded from evidence.”
“The motion to suppress statements, [Doc. 15], should likewise be GRANTED.”
“The motion to suppress evidence based upon unlawful search warrants, [Doc. 19], should be DENIED.”
A historical record
Judge Scofield no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.