Anna W. Howard
How Judge Howard rules, drawn from 2 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Howard decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Procedural preferences
In Broderick, her recommendation to deny the motion to quash or dismiss the indictment was adopted when no objections were filed.
“the R&R (Doc. No. [25]) is received with approval and ADOPTED as the Order of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion To Quash Or Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. [15]) is DENIED.”
Cautions
In Holloman, her recommendations to deny dismissal, suppression, and return-of-property motions were adopted in full over the defendant's objections.
“the R&R (Doc. No. [59]) is ADOPTED as the Order of the Court as correct in law and fact. Defendant's objections (Doc. No. [62]) are OVERRULED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. [36]) is DENIED”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“the R&R (Doc. No. [59]) is ADOPTED as the Order of the Court as correct in law and fact. Defendant's objections (Doc. No. [62]) are OVERRULED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. [36]) is DENIED”
“Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. No. [34]) is DENIED.”
“Defendant's Motion for Return of Property (Doc. No. [52]) is DENIED.”
“the R&R (Doc. No. [25]) is received with approval and ADOPTED as the Order of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion To Quash Or Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. [15]) is DENIED.”
Draft for Judge Howard with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Howard, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Howard's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace