Mary Grace Diehl

How Judge Diehl rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Diehl no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Status
Left this court 2018
Served
2004–2018
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Commissioned
February 23, 2004
Education
Canisius College, B.A. in History, 1974, summa cum laude; Harvard Law School, J.D., 1977, cum laude
Signed orders read
16

About Judge Diehl

Mary Grace Diehl joined the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia in February 2004 and began recall service in February 2018. She previously chaired the bankruptcy group at Troutman Sanders. She earned degrees from Canisius College and Harvard Law School.

How Judge Diehl decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Statutory fiduciary duties can support nondischargeability when the undisputed record shows a retailer failed to remit or safeguard entrusted proceeds.

“Plaintiff has met its burden and established as a matter of law that the debt owing resulted from Defendant’s defalcation when acting in a fiduciary capacity.”

Procedural preferences

A proposed amendment needs both supporting facts and a discernible legal theory; futility defeats leave to add a claim.

“Without allegations of the essential facts or presentation of a discernable legal theory, there is no basis for the Court to grant Plaintiffs Second Motion to Amend.”

Cautions

A prior verdict does not establish nondischargeable intent when its findings can rest on a less demanding state-law standard.

“Plaintiff has failed to meet her burden of proof in establishing the intent element under § 523(a)(6).”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Avaya, Inc. v. Matthews (In re Matthews)
· 2011-08-23
Motion for determination that automatic stay does not apply (Avaya, Inc.) Denied

“ORDERED that Avaya’s Motion is DENIED.”

Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Kunkle (In re Kunkle)
· 2011-10-31
Summary judgment (Georgia Lottery Corporation) Granted

“ORDERED that Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff.”

Kerr v. Commercial Credit Group, Inc. (In re Siskey Hauling Co.)
· 2011-09-02
Motion for reconsideration (FleetOne Factoring, LLC) Denied

“ORDERED that FleetOne’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.”

Marvin Hewatt Enterprises, Inc. v. Kyu Sup Mun (In re Kyu Sup Mun)
· 2011-09-01
Motion to amend complaint (Marvin Hewatt Enterprises, Inc.) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (debtor-defendant) Granted

“ORDERED that Debtor’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

In re Diplomat Construction, Inc.
· 2011-05-05
Motion to approve settlement (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“ORDERED that Trustee’s Motion for Authorization to Settle and Compromise Claims Against State Bank of Texas is GRANTED.”

Berrouet v. BAC Home Loan Servicing (In re Berrouet)
· 2012-03-26
Motion to determine secured status and strip lien (debtor) Denied

“ORDERED that Debtor’s Motion to Determine Secured Status of BAC Home Loan Servicing and to Strip Lien Effective Upon Discharge is hereby DENIED.”

Sky Top Enterprises, LLC v. Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC (In re Citrus Tower Boulevard Imaging Center, LLC)
· 2011-09-19
Motion for relief from automatic stay (Sky Top Enterprises, LLC) Granted in part

“It is ORDERED that SkyTop’s motion for relief from the automatic stay is partially GRANTED.”

Request for abstention (Sky Top Enterprises, LLC) Moot / procedural

“It is FURTHER ORDERED that Sky-Top’s request for the Court to abstain from the related, pending adversary proceeding is continued until further order of the Court.”

Terhune v. Houser (In re Houser)
· 2011-10-29
Summary judgment (plaintiff-creditor) Denied

“ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Kidd v. Student Loan Xpress, Inc. (In re Kidd)
· 2011-08-16
Motion for partial summary judgment (Student Loan Xpress, Inc. and Xpress Loan Servicing) Granted

“ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.”

Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Jackson (In re Jackson)
· 2010-02-09
Summary judgment (Georgia Lottery Corporation) Granted

“ORDERED that Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff.”

Dixon v. World Finance Corp. (In re Dixon)
· 2010-06-15
Motion to amend complaint (debtor-plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Amend to Substitute Party is GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (World Finance Corporation of Georgia) Granted

“It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement is GRANTED.”

Second motion to amend complaint (debtor-plaintiff) Denied

“It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Second Motion to Amend to Add Claim is DENIED.”

Kerr v. Commercial Credit Group, Inc. (In re Siskey Hauling Co.)
· 2011-08-03
Summary judgment (FleetOne Factoring, LLC) Denied

“ORDERED that FleetOne’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

A historical record

Judge Diehl no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.