Margaret H. Murphy

How Judge Murphy rules, drawn from 24 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Murphy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2015
Served
1987–2015
Commissioned
1987-01-01
Signed orders read
24

How Judge Murphy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Formal corporate titles do not substitute for evidence that the person actually exercised the financial authority the statute requires.

“A court cannot determine a person is responsible under the statute solely from a title, but must also consider whether the person performed the duties of an officer and exercised authority within the company.”

Recorded security instruments are expected to carry the required witness signatures before they are submitted for recordation.

“it costs nothing for lenders or their agents to review their paperwork to make sure the proper signatures are in place before submitting documents to the superior court for recording.”

Procedural preferences

An objection to discharge cannot be dismissed in exchange for money without undermining the public purpose of discharge litigation.

“settlements which involve the dismissal of an objection to discharge in return for the payment of money must be disapproved.”

Counsel must disclose the material circumstances surrounding a representative or proxy filing at the outset.

“It is left to each attorney to fully disclose the circumstances relevant to a filing.”

Cautions

Reconsideration is not a second opportunity to repeat arguments or enlarge the record for appeal.

“Bankruptcy Rule 9023 motions for new trial or to alter or amend an order should not be used to relitigate issues already decided, to pad the record for an appeal or to substitute for an appeal.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Tucker v. Ellis (In re Ellis)
· 2014-02-25
Default judgment (the plaintiff) Granted

“ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted:”

Eger v. Eger (In re Eger)
· 2014-02-03

A new bankruptcy filing did not stay the pending nondischargeability proceeding in the same bankruptcy court.

In re Pediatrics at Whitlock, P.C.
· 2014-03-05
Motion to dispense with patient care ombudsman (the debtor) Granted

“ORDERED that the Motion is granted;”

In re Ross
· 2014-03-26
Application to waive chapter 7 filing fee (the debtor) Granted

“ORDERED that the Application is granted.”

Katz v. Miles (In re Miles)
· 2011-03-29
Motion for reconsideration (the movants) Denied

“ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION”

Cannon v. United States (In re Cannon)
· 2011-03-31
Summary judgment (Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“Debtor’s tax liabilities for the tax years 1999, 2001 and 2002 are nondischargeable.”

In re Delco
· 2005-06-22
Motion to approve settlement and compromise (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“ORDERED that Trustee’s motion for approval of settlement and compromise is denied.”

Walton v. McCutcheon (In re McCutcheon)
· 2011-04-07
Summary judgment (United States Trustee) Granted

“ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

Haysman v. Georgia (In re Haysman)
· 2010-06-28
Summary judgment (Arnold Haysman) Granted

“For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is granted”

Summary judgment (Georgia Department of Revenue) Denied

“Defendant’s motion is denied.”

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services of America, LLC v. Corner Lot Inc. (In re Lyons)
· 2013-03-18
Motions to dismiss (Corner Lot Towing, Inc.) Denied

“ORDERED that Corner Lot, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss is denied.”

Ward v. Johnson & Freedman, LLC (In re Ward)
· 2011-03-30
Motions to dismiss (Johnson & Freedman, LLC and AMS Servicing, LLC) Granted in part

“ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint is denied as to the allegations of violation of § 1692c(a)(2) and granted as to the allegations of violation of §§ 1692g(b) and 1692g.”

Kerr v. Meadors (In re Knott)
· 2012-10-23
Objection to proof of claim (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“ORDERED that Trustee’s objection to Meadors’ § 507(a)(1)(A) priority claim is overruled: the Meadows claim is allowed as a domestic support obligation.”

A historical record

Judge Murphy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.