Lisa Ritchey Craig

How Judge Craig rules, drawn from 22 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Commissioned
March 24, 2016
Education
Mercer University, bachelor's degree, 1986; Mercer University School of Law, J.D., 1989
Signed orders read
22

About Judge Craig

Lisa Ritchey Craig has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Georgia since March 2016. Before joining the bench, she practiced law in Atlanta. She earned her undergraduate and law degrees from Mercer University.

Judge Craig's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Craig, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

For regular calendar matters, make announcements in person or email [email protected] before noon ET on the business day before the hearing.

“Announcements must be made (a) in person at the call of the calendar or (b) via email to [email protected] prior to 12:00 p.m. ET the business day prior to the scheduled hearing.”

Filing

File a Chapter 13 application for additional compensation within six months of the work for which counsel seeks payment.

“Judge Ritchey Craig requires that the Applications for Additional Compensation be filed within six months of the task that Counsel is seeking compensation.”

Conferences

For regular calendar hearings, obtain court permission before appearing by telephone or Zoom.

“Parties/attorneys may not appear for calendar calls or hearings via telephone or Zoom without specific permission from the Court”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Craig decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A timely remand request succeeds when the attempted removal was made by an entity that was not a party to the state action.

“a non-party does not have authority to remove a case from state court to federal court”

Procedural preferences

In Dobronski's bankruptcy adversary proceeding, Ritchey Craig gave the self-represented plaintiff 21 days to amend a complaint that relied heavily on a void default judgment.

“Plaintiff shall have twenty-one (21) days to amend the Complaint in accordance with this order.”

Cautions

Disputed evidence concerning intent and financial records can prevent summary judgment on discharge and dischargeability claims.

“summary judgment is not appropriate on any count of the Complaint”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Milani
15-54748-LRC · 2019-09-19
Motion for reconsideration (Francis X. Moore and FXM, P.C.) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 98) is DENIED;”

James v. PHH Mortgage Corporation and Waters Edge HOA (In re James)
17-50243-LRC; 17-5032-LRC · 2017-05-24
Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (PHH Mortgage Corporation) Granted

“ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED.”

Motion to dismiss adversary complaint (Waters Edge HOA) Granted
Bridges v. Fay Servicing LLC and Wilmington Trust Corporation (In re Bridges)
17-67339-LRC; 17-5260-LRC · 2018-02-27
Motion to strike motion to dismiss (Robert Elwood Bridges) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the Motion to Strike is DENIED.”

Lenox Pines, LLC v. Smith (In re Smith)
17-67324-LRC; 18-5005-LRC · 2021-03-31
Summary judgment (Lenox Pines, LLC) Denied

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.”

Georgia Department of Human Services v. Barnes (In re Barnes)
18-60371-LRC; 18-5246-LRC · 2019-03-04
Default judgment (Georgia Department of Human Services) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DHS’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is GRANTED”

Peverill v. Peverill (In re Peverill)
18-63378-LRC; 18-5303-LRC · 2019-09-09
Default judgment (Kimberly Peverill) Granted

“it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s default judgment motion is GRANTED;”

In re Landry
18-55697-LRC · 2020-07-21
Objection seeking reconsideration (debtor) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Objection is DENIED.”

In re Hardin
18-70395-LRC · 2019-10-04
Motion to strike deposition errata sheet (Zurich entities) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Strike Linda Hardin’s Errata Sheet (Doc. 139) is DENIED;”

West Village Holdings, LLC v. ONH Holdings, LLC (In re West Village Holdings, LLC)
19-50013-LRC; 19-5116-LRC · 2020-03-31
Summary judgment (West Village Holdings, LLC) Granted in part

“granting in part and denying in part the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by West Village Holdings, LLC”

Summary judgment (ONH Holdings, LLC) Granted in part

“granted in part and denied in part the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by ONH Holdings, LLC”

Zurich American Insurance Company v. Hardin (In re Hardin)
18-70395-LRC; 19-5145-LRC · 2019-09-30
Motion to strike surreply (Zurich entities) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Hardin’s Unauthorized Surreply (Doc. 19) is DENIED;”

Zurich American Insurance Company v. Hardin (In re Hardin)
18-70395-LRC; 19-5145-LRC · 2023-09-22
Judgment on the pleadings (Henry C. Hardin III) Denied

“IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 54) is DENIED.”

Smith v. Shibley (In re Shibley)
18-68584-LRC; 19-5212-LRC · 2019-09-25
Motion to strike answer (Daniel Richard Smith) Denied

“Plaintiff’s request to strike the Answer is DENIED”

Motion to dismiss counterclaim (Daniel Richard Smith) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff’s request for dismissal of the Smith Counterclaim is STAYED”

Motion to stay counterclaim (CenterState Bank, N.A.) Granted

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (Doc. 10) is GRANTED”

Draft for Judge Craig with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Craig, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Craig's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace