Charles H. Weigle

United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia magistrate 13 signed orders read

How Judge Weigle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Recommends dismissal of prisoner civil-rights claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act where the complaint was filed before the grievance response period had run, even if a later supplemental or amended complaint tries to cure the timing defect.

“Smith's original complaint was filed 25 days after his grievance... the Magistrate Judge properly found that Smith failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he filed his complaint before the warden's time to respond had expired.”

In Social Security appeals, upholds the ALJ's residual-functional-capacity finding where the ALJ ties the discounting of an earlier medical opinion to specific, later medical evidence in the record, rather than treating any unweighted opinion as automatic error.

“The ALJ referred to specific medical records when disregarding the opinions and when finding the RFC that incorporated Plaintiff's upper right extremity limitations.”

Cautions

Treats an unreasonably long extension-of-time request (here, twelve months to object to a recommendation) as a signal to proceed to decision rather than delay, particularly where the objecting party's own filings show they do not need the extension they are requesting.

“A twelve-month extension is unreasonable on its face. The Plaintiff argues that his illiteracy and lack of education renders him completely reliant on others, but he filed this motion, which is thoughtfully organized and cites legal authority, without assistance.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Barrion v. McLaughlin
5:18-cv-00281-MTT-CHW · 2020-03-19
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“That portion of the Recommendation (Doc. 76) is ADOPTED and made the Order of the Court, and Barrion's motions for summary judgment (Docs. 59; 67) are DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is DENIED as to the claims against Defendants Thomas, Eaddie, and McLaughlin in their individual capacities for damages based on Thomas's cross-cuffing Barrion while he was being transported from Augusta State Medical Prison to Macon State Prison on November 6, 2017, and it is GRANTED as to all other claims.”

Motion to appoint counsel (plaintiff) Denied

“Barrion's motions to appoint counsel (Docs. 79; 85) are therefore DENIED.”

Meriwether v. Battle
5:19-cv-00285-MTT-CHW · 2021-06-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Recommendation (Doc. 39) is ADOPTED and made the order of the Court. Accordingly, Battle's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30) is GRANTED.”

Smith v. Sampson
5:22-cv-00170-MTT-CHW · 2024-08-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED and Smith's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 55) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Ates v. Holt
5:16-cv-00022-MTT-CHW · 2017-01-04
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED and Petitioner's federal habeas petition is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state court remedies.”

Mathis v. Bacon
5:16-cv-59-MTT-CHW · 2016-08-19
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (Doc. 10), and the Petitioner's Section 2254 petition is DISMISSED.”

Powell v. Tatum
5:16-cv-00451-MTT-CHW · 2017-08-25
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED and the Petitioner's Section 2254 petition is DIMISSED with prejudice as untimely.”

Certificate of appealability (petitioner) Denied

“the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED and the Petitioner is DENIED a COA.”

Barfield v. Lewis
5:17-cv-00240-MTT-CHW · 2018-02-13
Motion for temporary restraining order (plaintiff) Denied

“the Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 3) is DENIED.”

Boggs v. Webb
5:12-cv-00472-MTT · 2014-02-18
Voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

Summary judgment (mixed) Moot / procedural

“The six pending motions for summary judgment are DENIED as moot. (Docs. 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44).”

Crumpton v. Colvin
5:13-cv-00166-MTT-CHW · 2014-09-16
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.”

Mendez-Ramos v. United States
5:17-cr-13 (MTT) / 5:21-cv-244 (MTT) · 2024-09-26
Motion to vacate sentence 2255 (movant) Denied

“The Recommendation (Doc. 644) is ADOPTED. Mendez-Ramos's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion (Doc. 616) is DENIED.”

Certificate of appealability (movant) Denied

“the Court further concludes that Mendez-Ramos has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is also DENIED.”

Gholston v. Morales
5:20-cv-491-MTT-CHW · 2022-01-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) is GRANTED. Gholston's motions for leave to file a supplemental complaint (Docs. 47; 48) are DENIED.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Gholston's motions for leave to file a supplemental complaint (Docs. 47; 48) are DENIED.”

Hines v. Butts
5:18-cv-00456-MTT-CHW · 2019-12-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Hines' official capacity claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED, and her claims against Butts and Stubbs are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The Defendants' second motion to dismiss (Doc. 40) is DENIED”

Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“Hines' motion for reconsideration (Doc. 47) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Drawn from a sample of dockets assigned to him, Weigle's own docket is dominated by Social Security disability appeals decided by the parties' consent (Title II DIWC/DIWW and Title XVI SSID claims), a heavy volume of criminal magistrate duty (initial appearances and complaints on petty offenses and felony arrests), and a smaller number of habeas, civil-rights, and contract matters. A 2003-2011 legacy cohort shows the same Social Security-heavy mix going back to his earliest years on the bench.

Put Judge Weigle's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Weigle actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Weigle's own signed orders and cites them.