William Matthewman

How Judge Matthewman rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Matthewman no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Status
Retired 2026
Served
2012–2026
Commissioned
July 2, 2012
Education
Florida International University (B.S., 1981); Florida International University (M.P.A.); University of Florida (J.D., with Honors, 1983; Research Editor, Florida Law Review)
Signed orders read
16

About Judge Matthewman

William Matthewman served as a U.S. magistrate judge in the Southern District of Florida from 2012 until his retirement on July 31, 2026. He became the district’s chief magistrate judge in 2025. He earned a law degree from the University of Florida and previously served as a Miami-Dade police officer and practiced law at Holland & Knight.

How Judge Matthewman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Bonomo v. United States, Matthewman recommended summary judgment for the government after finding that the taxpayers lacked sufficient proof of timely mailing for their Form 3520-A.

“Here, the only proof of delivery for Plaintiffs’ Form 3520-A is that the IRS received it on October 18, 2019.”

Procedural preferences

In Hamilton v. Shepard, he recommended vacating a default judgment as void and dismissing the claims without prejudice because the defendants had not been properly served under Rule 4.

“Defendants' Motion to Vacate Entry of Default Judgment [DE 51] should be GRANTED; ... the judgment is void due to the failure of Plaintiff to properly and legally effect service of process”

Cautions

In Losee v. Gebreyes, he recommended striking the defendants' pleadings and entering default after their willful, bad-faith violations of court orders; the district judge adopted that recommendation.

“Judge Matthewman recommends striking Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses for their willful, bad faith violations of this Court's Orders. ... Defendants' Pleadings ... shall be STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. ... The clerk SHALL ENTER default against the Defendants.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Land FML 2, Inc. v. Data Score-M, LLC
9:22-cv-80801-DMM · 2023-02-16
Sanctions (unspecified) Granted

“The Report recommends that (1) Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, (2) Plaintiff's pleadings be stricken ... Magistrate Judge Matthewman's Report and Recommendation (DE 78) is ADOPTED.”

Saint-Cyr v. Walgreen Co.
9:21-cv-82066-WPD · 2022-07-12
Motion for bill of costs (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Bill of Costs [DE's 43/44] is GRANTED; ... Plaintiff is hereby ordered to pay Defendants their total costs in the amount of $402.00.”

Bonomo v. United States
9:24-cv-80199-DSL · 2025-02-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment ... Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 45] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“and granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment ... Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] is GRANTED.”

O'Bryan v. Joe Taylor Restoration, Inc.
9:20-cv-80993-WPD · 2022-01-24
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Denied

“The Court agrees with the Magistrate's conclusion that the Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Costs [DE 92] sought by Defendants should be denied. ... Defendants' Motion for Attorney's Fees and Non-Taxable Costs [DE 92] is hereby DENIED.”

Hamilton v. Shepard and Citibank
9:20-cv-81137-WPD · 2021-06-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE 50] should be GRANTED for insufficient service of process and failure to state a cause of action; ... Plaintiff's Complaint [DE 1] should be DISMISSED without prejudice and Plaintiff granted leave to file an amended complaint”

Motion to vacate default (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Motion to Vacate Entry of Default Judgment [DE 51] should be GRANTED; ... the judgment is void due to the failure of Plaintiff to properly and legally effect service of process”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“To the extent Plaintiff's 'Motion to Object Order to Vacate and order to grant Summary Judgement' [DE 57] seeks relief, it should be DENIED without prejudice.”

Motion to transfer venue (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff's Motion to Change Venue [DE 52] should be DENIED as moot.”

Losee v. Gebreyes
9:19-cv-80265-DMM · 2023-10-19
Sanctions (unspecified) Granted

“Judge Matthewman recommends striking Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses for their willful, bad faith violations of this Court's Orders. ... Defendants' Pleadings ... shall be STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. ... The clerk SHALL ENTER default against the Defendants.”

Waterman v. Merkle
· 2025-02-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the Undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion be GRANTED and that the Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART AND STAYED IN PART.”

Trisura Specialty Insurance Co. v. South Florida Lodging, LLC
· 2025-03-26
Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“In this particular case, the Motion should be denied. This, of course, should be without prejudice to Plaintiff renewing its arguments at the motion for summary judgment stage of the case.”

Dippolito v. Florida Department of Corrections
· 2025-04-22
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the United States District Judge DENY Petitioner's Petition [DE 1] and DENY a Certificate of Appealability.”

Amorim v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
· 2025-05-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court RECOMMENDS that the District Judge GRANT the Motion to Dismiss [DE 44] and DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Counts II and III and DENY AS MOOT the Motion for Reconsideration [DE 9].”

Hillstrom v. United States
· 2025-07-01
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis [Cv-DE 1] be DENIED.”

Bishop v. City of Boynton Beach
· 2025-10-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Motion be GRANTED and that the Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202101
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Matthewman no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.