William J. Zloch

How Judge Zloch rules, drawn from 12 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
November 4, 1985
ABA rating
Qualified
Education
University of Notre Dame (B.A., 1966); Notre Dame Law School (J.D., 1974)
Signed orders read
12

About Judge Zloch

William J. Zloch is a senior judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, he received his commission on November 4, 1985, and assumed senior status on January 31, 2017.

Judge Zloch's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Zloch's own (checked October 21, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Rubin v. Astrue
0:07-cv-60854-WJZ · 2008-04-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 8) be and the same is hereby DENIED;”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 11) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Brown v. Carriage Cemetery Services, Inc.
0:08-cv-60594-WJZ · 2008-07-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Services, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss (DE 7) be and the same is hereby DENIED.”

Spano v. Satz
0:09-cv-60255-WJZ · 2009-06-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint (DE 41) be and the same is hereby DENIED.”

Turner v. Creative Hospitality Ventures, Inc.
Case 08-61040-CIV · 2008-12-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 15), Defendant’s Motion To Stay Proceedings (DE 19) be and the same are hereby DENIED;”

Motion to stay proceedings (defendant) Denied
Motion to extend deadlines (joint) Granted

“the Parties’ Joint Motion To Extend Certain Trial-Related Deadlines (DE 17) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Motion for discovery extension (joint) Granted

“The Parties’ Joint Motion For Extension Of Time To Complete Discovery (DE 24) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Cruz v. Advance Stores Co.
Case No. 11-60924-CIV · 2012-02-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant, Advance Stores Company, Inc.’s Motion For Summary Final Judgment (DE 20) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

GDG Acquisitions LLC v. Government of Belize
Case No. 12-20558-CIV · 2013-03-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant The Government Of Belize’s Motion To Dismiss The Complaint (DE 20) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Moynihan v. West Coast Life Insurance
Case 09-60290-CIV · 2009-04-07
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss (DE 10) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Weissman v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.
No. 03-61107-CIV · 2008-03-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss (DE 72) be and the same is hereby DENIED.”

Sizemore v. Affordable Battery, Inc.
Case No. 13-61005-CIV · 2014-09-24
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“Defendants Affordable Battery, Inc., Affordable Battery of Sunrise, Inc., and Curtis N. Soles’s Motion For Summary Judgment (DE 32) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Precious Metals, LLC
Case No. 11-61075-CIV · 2011-09-30
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (DE 20) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Kennedy v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.
Case 09-61157-MC · 2009-08-12
Petition to enforce arbitration subpoena (respondent) Denied

“Respondent American Express Travel Related Services Company’s Petition To Enforce Subpoena Duces Tecum Against Patricia Lurie (DE 3) be and the same is hereby DENIED;”

Fly Brazil Group v. the Govt. of Gabon, Africa
09-60239-CZLOCH/ROSENBAUM · 2010-01-29
Motion to quash service (defendant) Granted

“Defendant the Government of Gabon, Africa’s Motion To Quash Plaintiff Fly Brazil Group, Inc.’s Third Service Attempt Of The Verified Amended Complaint For Insufficient Service Of Process (DE 28) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Motion to extend service deadline (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff Fly Brazil Group, Inc.’s Agreed Motion Approving The January 22, 2010 Report And Recommendation And Granting Plaintiff Sixty (60) Days To Effect Service Of Process On The Government Of Gabon, Africa (DE 51) be and the same is hereby GRANTED;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 2 days (N = 21).

The selected matters include mortgage, commercial, employment and other civil claims. This small targeted set does not establish a caseload mix.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202120
Sep 202020

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, not for Judge Zloch: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed8,1963.4 months
Closed with no court action8483 months
Closed before pretrial7,2873.5 months
Closed during or after pretrial1610.1 months
Closed during trial4517.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20258,1963.4 months
Sep 20247,7553.6 months
Sep 202320,4080 months
Sep 20228,2873.7 months
Sep 20218,5363.2 months
Sep 20208,6573.4 months
Sep 20199,4713.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Zloch with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Zloch, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Zloch's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace