Shaniek Mills Maynard

How Judge Maynard rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Signed orders read
25

About Judge Maynard

Shaniek Mills Maynard has served as a U.S. magistrate judge for the Southern District of Florida in Fort Pierce since June 2017. Before joining the bench, she was an assistant U.S. attorney and led a St. Lucie County program serving young people. She earned degrees from Howard University and Yale Law School.

Judge Maynard's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Maynard, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Send confidential settlement memoranda to chambers by email and mark them against docketing.

“each shall submit to this Court a Memorandum setting forth its position. The parties shall send their respective Memoranda directly to the undersigned’s Chambers by emailing them to: [email protected]. Given their confidential content, the Memoranda shall indicate clearly that they are NOT to be docketed in the case docket.”

Conferences

Parties with full settlement authority must personally attend a settlement conference under Judge Maynard’s standard order.

“Parties with full and complete settlement authority are required to personally attend the conference.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Maynard decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In United States v. Sharfi, she recommended denying the government’s summary-judgment motion and granting the landowners’ cross-motion after finding the man-made ditches were not relatively permanent waters and the wetlands lacked a continuous surface-water connection.

“Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 154) be granted ... Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 154) is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter judgment for Defendant.”

Procedural preferences

In L.H. v. Okeechobee County School Board, she recommended denying dismissal of a compulsory counterclaim as untimely because the IDEA’s 90-day period for an original action did not govern it.

“ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 68] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 58] is DENIED.”

Cautions

In Sneed v. Persad, she recommended dismissal without prejudice of a civil-rights complaint because Younger abstention and shotgun-pleading defects barred it as pleaded.

“Judge Maynard issued the Report, recommending that the Motion be granted ... dismissal is appropriate because (i) Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Younger abstention doctrine, and (ii) the Complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading ... the Report [ECF No. 33] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED ... This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Yost-Rudge v. City of Stuart
2:23-cv-14270-DMM · 2024-04-08
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard's Report and Recommendation regarding Defendants' Amended Motion to Dismiss ... is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Complaint (DE 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Sneed v. Persad
2:24-cv-14169-MD · 2025-04-23
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Judge Maynard issued the Report, recommending that the Motion be granted ... dismissal is appropriate because (i) Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Younger abstention doctrine, and (ii) the Complaint is an impermissible shotgun pleading ... the Report [ECF No. 33] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED ... This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

United States v. Sharfi
2:21-cv-14205-KAM · 2024-12-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Report recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 150) be denied ... Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 150) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 154) be granted ... Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 154) is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter judgment for Defendant.”

United States v. Garipoli
9:24-cv-80573-AHS · 2025-01-28
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Denied

“recommending that Plaintiff's Motion be denied ... this Report and Recommendation (DE [43]) ... is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant, Elizabeth Angela Bellon, Only (DE [16]) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

L.H. v. Okeechobee County School Board
2:18-cv-14299-MARTINEZ-MAYNARD · 2020-09-15
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 68] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 58] is DENIED.”

Piedra v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
· 2025-10-28
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“I respectfully RECOMMEND that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, DE 14, be GRANTED; that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, DE 16, be DENIED; and that Defendant's final administrative decision be REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the findings made in this report.”

Gayle v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society
· 2025-04-18
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“I respectfully RECOMMEND that Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency TRO, DE 6, be DENIED.”

Lors v. O&L Law Group, P.L.
· 2025-07-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“I respectfully recommend that the Motion be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and that the complaint be dismissed in its entirety but with leave to file an amended complaint.”

Higgs v. Commissioner of Social Security
· 2025-07-30
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“I respectfully RECOMMEND that Plaintiff's Motion, DE 18, be GRANTED and that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $7,300 under the EAJA”

Smith v. James
· 2025-04-25
Motion for bill of costs (defendant) Denied

“I respectfully RECOMMEND that Mark Sohn's Motion for Bill of Costs, DE 206, be DENIED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to comply with the timing requirements of Southern District of Florida Local Rule 7.3(c).”

Campos v. Chavam Enterprises, Inc.
· 2025-04-14
Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Granted

“I therefore certify the facts set out above and RECOMMEND that presiding U.S. District Judge Judge Rosenberg GRANT Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Contempt, DE 67, by setting a show cause hearing”

Jennis v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections
· 2026-05-01
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“I respectfully recommend that the Amended Motion to Reopen Habeas Proceeding, DE 34, be DENIED, and that this case be CLOSED.”

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202001

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, not for Judge Maynard: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed8,1963.4 months
Closed with no court action8483 months
Closed before pretrial7,2873.5 months
Closed during or after pretrial1610.1 months
Closed during trial4517.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20258,1963.4 months
Sep 20247,7553.6 months
Sep 202320,4080 months
Sep 20228,2873.7 months
Sep 20218,5363.2 months
Sep 20208,6573.4 months
Sep 20199,4713.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Maynard with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Maynard, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Maynard's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace