Lisette M. Reid

“In the Report, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that the Court grant Defendant's Motion. ... The Report (DE 41) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 29) is GRANTED.”

“Defendant Dena Paquette's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 59] ... [is] GRANTED ... Judge Reid determined that Defendant Paquette's Motion should be granted to the extent that it seeks summary judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies”

“the Motion for Summary Judgment filed jointly by Defendants Michael McInnis and Mark Putnam [DE 63] ... [is] GRANTED ... Plaintiff failed to show that Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs”

“the R&R ... suggested that we dismiss Claims 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 as time-barred ... and ... deny the remaining claims ... on the merits ... The R&R [ECF No. 19] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Kleckley's Petition [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED in part as untimely ... The Petition is DENIED in part as to all other claims. Any requests for ... a certificate of appealability are DENIED.”

“Chetu's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 101] ... [is] GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART ... GRANTED on Blue Chip's theory that Chetu falsely represented that it dedicates an entire team of qualified professionals to each project; and DENIED on the theory that Chetu aggressively enforces the SLAPP Clause”

“Blue Chip's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 103] ... GRANTED on the theory that the contract's termination clause was breached. Blue Chip is entitled to damages in the amount of $156,000.00 for Chetu's breach.”

During statutory screening of the plaintiff's sixth duplicative self-represented action over a child-guardianship dispute, Judge Reid recommended denying leave to proceed without prepayment and dismissing the case with prejudice. This was a court-initiated screening recommendation rather than a ruling on a party motion.

“The R&R recommends denying Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis ‘because it does not comply with the filing requirements of 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915(a) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) and because Petitioner has not met his burden of showing a non-frivolous issue for appeal.’ ... Magistrate Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation (DE 32) be, and the same is, hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of this Court; ... The Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (DE 27) is hereby DENIED”

“On August 21, 2020, Judge Reid issued a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that the Motion be dismissed as untimely. ... Magistrate Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation [DE 9 under Case No. 9:19-CV-81350] is ADOPTED as the Order of the Court. ... Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec 2255 [DE 1 under Case No. 9:19-CV-81350; DE 369 under Case No. 9:15-CV-80077] is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY.”

“On October 13, 2020, Judge Reid issued a Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, recommending the Court dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 1) without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court Orders. ... Judge Reid's Report of Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Complaint Under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec 1983 (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.”

“On November 17, 2020, Magistrate Judge Reid issued the R&R, recommending that Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs be granted. ... ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the R&R (D.E. 36) is ADOPTED, RATIFIED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (D.E. 32) and Plaintiff's Motion for Bill of Costs (D.E. 29) are GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to a total award of $16,213.81”

“The Court referred the matter to the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that both Motions be DENIED. (‘R&R’) (ECF No. 21). ... As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.”

“Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that the Motion to Correct Docket be denied because in that Motion Petitioner requests that the docket reflect this case as active, however this case is closed and should remain closed. ... to the extent that Petitioner seeks to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. Sec 3582 in the Motion to Correct Docket, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that it be denied because the Court does not have jurisdiction”

“Magistrate Judge Reid filed a Report and Recommendation (‘R&R’) concluding that Plaintiff's motion to reopen should be denied as legally insufficient. (DE 49). Movant did not file objections. ... ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Reid's Report and Recommendation (DE 49) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. The Motion (DE 46) is DENIED.”

“This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (the ‘Report’) [DE 32] of the Honorable Lisette M. Reid, U.S. Magistrate Judge, on Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen [DE 31]. In her thorough and well-reasoned Report, Judge Reid recommends that: the Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen be denied. ... The Report and Recommendation [DE 32] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED ... Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen [DE 31] is DENIED.”