Jonathan Goodman

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida magistrate 14 signed orders read

How Judge Goodman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a Daubert motion, recommends excluding the challenged expert testimony; district judges have adopted the recommendation over objections.

“Judge Goodman recommends that this Court grant Defendant's Motion. ... Accordingly, Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 97) is GRANTED.”

Procedural preferences

Works the fees/costs/sanctions referral lane -- recommends granting attorney-fee and cost awards in part, and apportioning sanctions to responsible counsel.

“USIC's Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees is granted in part and denied in part. As such, pursuant to Florida Statutes 768.79, USIC is awarded $55,007.10 in attorney's fees.”

Cautions

On motions for default judgment, recommends granting only in part and denying without prejudice where a plaintiff has not properly established the basis for judgment (e.g., subject-matter jurisdiction).

“recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs' motion. ... For Mr. Parent, Judge Goodman recommends that Plaintiffs' Motion be denied without prejudice in its entirety. For Mr. Zarley ... granted in its entirety. For Mr. Hansen ... granted in its entirety.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

GBS Investment Group v. United Specialty Insurance Company
1:18-cv-23310-MGC · 2020-09-06
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Granted in part

“USIC's Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees is granted in part and denied in part. As such, pursuant to Florida Statutes 768.79, USIC is awarded $55,007.10 in attorney's fees.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Granted in part

“USIC's Motion for Sanctions is granted in part and denied in part. I, therefore, find Plaintiff's Counsel, Gregory Saldamando, to be responsible for half of USIC's attorney's fees incurred in bringing its Motion for Sanctions”

Katzoff v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd. (Norwegian Cruise Lines)
1:19-cv-22754-MGC · 2021-07-14
Daubert motion (defendant) Granted

“Judge Goodman recommends that this Court grant Defendant's Motion. ... Accordingly, Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 97) is GRANTED.”

Houston Specialty Insurance Co. v. Fontecilla
1:20-cv-20725-JEM · 2022-11-22
Motion to tax costs (defendant) Granted

“Defendants Daniela Fontecilla and Law Offices of Daniela Fontecilla, P.A.'s Motion to Tax Costs (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Defendants ... are awarded $466.32 in taxable costs.”

Isaac Industries, Inc. v. Petroquimica de Venezuela, S.A.
1:19-cv-23113-RNS · 2022-04-22
Motion for default (plaintiff) Denied

“recommending that the Court deny the motion as well as dismiss the complaint, without prejudice, providing the Plaintiff with an opportunity to amend the complaint in order to properly assert subject-matter jurisdiction ... The Court thus denies the Plaintiff's motion for the entry of a default (ECF No. 60).”

Birmingham v. RoFX.net
1:21-cv-23472-RNS · 2024-03-08
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs' motion. ... For Mr. Parent, Judge Goodman recommends that Plaintiffs' Motion be denied without prejudice in its entirety. For Mr. Zarley ... granted in its entirety. For Mr. Hansen ... granted in its entirety.”

Associated Energy Group, LLC v. Ukraine International Airlines PJSC
1:23-cv-21036-RNS · 2024-08-20
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Judge Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion. ... The Court grants Plaintiff's renewed motion for default judgment. ... the Court enters judgment in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant for $636,154.47.”

Goorin Bros., Inc. v. Individuals on Schedule A
1:24-cv-21809 · 2024-12-23
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the Undersigned respectfully recommends that the District Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's motion”

Chanel, Inc. v. Individuals on Schedule A
1:24-cv-24380 · 2024-12-16
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“the Undersigned respectfully recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction”

Omega SA v. Individuals on Schedule A
1:24-cv-24766 · 2025-01-17
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“the Undersigned respectfully recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction”

Fanatics, LLC v. Individuals on Schedule A
1:24-cv-24920 · 2025-03-25
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Granted

“the Undersigned respectfully recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction”

Betancourt v. Corporacion Hotelera Palma LLC
1:24-cv-22126 · 2025-02-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“grant Driftwood's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in part and deny it in part”

Lorenzo v. Levy
1:24-cv-24647 · 2025-01-06

Screening recommendation that a pro se complaint be sua sponte dismissed without prejudice as a shotgun pleading and for failure to state an FLSA claim (no adversary motion).

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Civil-duty cases are pending; criminal magistrate matters (warrants/complaints) terminate the same day. No terminated-merits durations or disposition records are available from this sample. Judge Goodman's substantive output is in his recommendations, not these direct assignments.

Put Judge Goodman's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Goodman actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Goodman's own signed orders and cites them.