Jared M. Strauss

“Judge Strauss has since issued a report, recommending that the Court grant summary judgment as to Plaintiff's federal claims and remand Plaintiff's remaining state claims ... Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 47] is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claims. Plaintiff's remaining state claims are REMANDED”

“this Court affirms Judge Strauss's finding that Plaintiff's Complaint fails to comply with Rules 8 and 10 ... the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (DE [23]) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (DE [18]) is GRANTED ... All causes raised herein by complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 46] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. Defendant's Objections [ECF No. 50] are OVERRULED. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence [ECF No. 24] is DENIED.”

“The Report recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees ... Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $19,165.00.”

“Magistrate Judge Strauss recommends granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion to Tax Costs and awarding Defendant taxable costs in the amount of $4,663.25 ... Defendant's Motion to Tax Costs [ECF No. 131] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

R&R on competency rather than a party motion. Strauss recommended, and Judge Ruiz adopted over the defendant's objections, a finding that Xavier Rivers was competent to stand trial or enter a plea, crediting Dr. Katherine E. Sunder's testimony in the absence of a contrary expert opinion. The disposition demonstrates Strauss's criminal competency-referral work.

“The Report recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17] and grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 18]. ... 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17] is DENIED.”

“3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED.”

“Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's Motion for Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 107], is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part as follows: a. GRANTED as to Count I of the Complaint; and b. DENIED as to Counts II-IX of the Complaint.”

“The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED in part as to the Plaintiff's duty-to-warn claim. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.”

“Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Gigi and Zroya, see [DE 8], is DENIED;”

“Defendants Gigi and Zroya's Motion to Dismiss [DE 51] is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; ... the Court now DISMISSES Plaintiffs' claims pled herein against Defendants Gigi and Zroya in favor of mediation and/or arbitration.”

“Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, [ECF No. 53], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts III and VIII and DENIED as to all other counts.”

“Magistrate Judge Strauss's R&R [ECF No. 73] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. The Plaintiff's Objections [ECF No. 74] are OVERRULED. ... Fenix's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 65] is GRANTED. Count I of the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 63] is DISMISSED with prejudice. ... The Plaintiff's Motion to Amend [ECF No. 75] is DENIED.”