Donald L. Graham

How Judge Graham rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
George H. W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
September 16, 1991
ABA rating
Qualified
Education
West Virginia State College (B.A., 1971); Ohio State University College of Law (J.D., 1974)
Signed orders read
13

About Judge Graham

Donald L. Graham serves as a senior judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. He received his commission on September 16, 1991, and assumed senior status on December 15, 2013.

Judge Graham's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Graham, as published on the court's website (checked October 21, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Contact chambers if a ripe motion or a decision after oral argument or a bench trial remains pending for more than 45 days.

“In this Division, if a ripe motion or decision after oral argument or a bench trial is pending for more than forty-five (45) days, please contact Chambers and advise the Judicial Administrator of the pendency of the motion.”

Filing

Send a proposed order with every motion in Word or WordPerfect format by separate email to chambers.

“Include a proposed order with all motions in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. The proposed document should be sent separately by e-mail in WordPerfect or Word format.”

Filing

After electing magistrate judge jurisdiction for all further proceedings, mark later pleadings CONSENT CASE in bold below the case number.

“If the parties elect to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, please have all pleadings filed thereafter indicate that election by typing ‘CONSENT CASE’ in bold type under the case number.”

Motions

Requests to extend, continue, or enlarge time are rarely granted.

“Motions to Extend, Continue or Enlarge will rarely be granted.”

Motions

An extension motion must list the motions deadline, pretrial conference, calendar call, trial period, prior extension requests, and whether it was referred to a magistrate judge.

“For all motions requesting extensions of time, the moving party should type on the middle right hand side of the pleading, the deadline for filing motions, the date of the pretrial conference, calendar call and trial period, if applicable. Also, advise the number of times requests for extensions of time have been filed and whether the motion has been referred to the Magistrate Judge.”

Motions

Only one motion to extend per party will be considered.

“In other words, no more than one Motion to Extend per party will be considered.”

Motions

For appropriate motions, give the opposing parties’ positions and specify the manner, dates, and number of attempts to confer.

“Please indicate with specificity the manner in which reasonable efforts were initiated (via facsimile, e-mail or voice-mail), the dates of such efforts, and the number of times an inquiry and follow up on the response to the inquiry was sought.”

Discovery

Request any extension of the discovery deadline at least ten days before it expires, after trying to obtain the discovery and resolve the dispute.

“Do not request extensions of the discovery deadline without making every effort to obtain discovery and resolve discovery disputes. Any requests to extend the discovery deadline must be made at least ten (10) days before the expiration of the discovery deadline.”

Discovery

In civil cases assigned to Graham, do not file written discovery motions; use the linked discovery procedures.

“Parties are directed to not file written discovery motions. Rather, they must follow these discovery procedures.”

Discovery

Before seeking a discovery hearing, counsel must confer in person or by phone and genuinely try to resolve the dispute.

“First, counsel must actually confer (in person or via telephone) and engage in reasonable compromise in a genuine effort to resolve their discovery disputes before seeking court intervention.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Meshchaninova v. Saul
1:19-cv-24895-DLG · 2021-03-30
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff=s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 33] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant=s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 34] is GRANTED.”

Moody v. Miami-Dade County
1:19-cv-24638-DLG · 2021-08-19
Motion for bill of costs (defendants) Granted

“judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants in the amount of $5,982.80.”

Lianski v. Las Mercedes Restaurant, Inc.
1:21-cv-20761-DLG · 2021-08-02

The court adopted a settlement recommendation and dismissed the action with prejudice; the order identifies no pending motion that it resolves on the merits.

United States v. Acevedo
2:24-cr-14010-DLG · 2024-07-16
Motion to suppress (defendant Stanley Rumowski) Denied

“Defendant Rumowski ' s First Motion to Suppress Tangible Objects (Seized Contraband) (ECF No. 32) is DENIED.”

Motion to suppress (defendant Joseph Acevedo) Denied

“(ECF No. 35) is DENIED.”

Coffey v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Case No. 13-14429-CIV · 2014-02-03
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [D.E. 4] is DENIED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants Nationstar and FNMA’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Verified Complaint [D.E. 3] is GRANTED.”

Gregory v. Miami-Dade County
Case No. 13-21350-CIV · 2015-02-13
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Miami-Dade County’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint [D.E. 63] is GRANTED.”

National Specialty Insurance v. ABS Freight Transporation, Inc.
Case No. 13-14431-CIV · 2014-12-04
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Audrey Martin-Vegue’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count II [D.E. 43] is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 45] is GRANTED.”

Kammona v. Onteco Corp.
Case No. 13-20190-CIV · 2013-07-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Onteco’s Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 24] is GRANTED.”

Ash v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Case No. 13-20619-CIV · 2013-12-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Dutch Tours’ Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 61] is GRANTED.”

Motions to strike (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Corrected Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority [D.E. 83] is GRANTED.”

Motion for scheduling order (joint) Moot / procedural

“the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Scheduling Order Regarding RDVT’s Forthcoming Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens [D.E. 49] and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Jurisdictional Discovery [D.E. 50] is DENIED as moot.”

Motion for discovery extension (plaintiff) Moot / procedural
Sherman v. Kings Yacht Miami, LLC
1:20-cv-24912-DLG · 2025-02-13
Motion for civil contempt (plaintiff) Granted

“Kutay Satiroglu in Contempt of Court and for Issuance of Writ of Bodily Attachment. (ECF No. 112) is GRANTED.”

United States v. Wade
0:23-cr-60173-KMW · 2025-08-25
Motion to stay pending appeal (defendant) Denied

“Motion to Stay Jail Sentence Pending Appeal (ECF No. 288) are DENIED.”

Morhardt v. Carnival Corp.
16-24580-CIV-GRAHAM/SIMONTON · 2017-12-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Carnival's Motion for Summary Judgment [D.E. 36] is GRANTED.”

Motion to strike expert and for adverse inference (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Motion to Strike Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Lee Swanger, and for a Jury Instruction Regarding an Adverse Inference Because of Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [D.E. 38] is DENIED as moot.”

Daubert motion to strike expert (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“Plaintiff Morhardt's Daubert Motion to Strike Defendant's Expert, Lee Swanger [D.E. 41] is DENIED as moot.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 4.5 days (N = 6).

The ten selected cases include four older civil matters chosen for available orders and six more recent matters. This selection does not establish a case mix for the judge’s full docket.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202401
Sep 202301
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202201
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, not for Judge Graham: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed8,1963.4 months
Closed with no court action8483 months
Closed before pretrial7,2873.5 months
Closed during or after pretrial1610.1 months
Closed during trial4517.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20258,1963.4 months
Sep 20247,7553.6 months
Sep 202320,4080 months
Sep 20228,2873.7 months
Sep 20218,5363.2 months
Sep 20208,6573.4 months
Sep 20199,4713.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Graham with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Graham, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Graham's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace