Ann E. Vitunac

How Judge Vitunac rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Signed orders read
9

About Judge Vitunac

Ann E. Vitunac serves as a recall United States magistrate judge for the Southern District of Florida. The court lists her in Fort Pierce.

Judge Vitunac's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Vitunac's own (checked October 21, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bronstein v. Bronstein
9:06-cv-80656 · 2006-10-05
Preliminary injunction (defendant and counter plaintiff) Denied

“Movant’s Emergency Motion to for Injunctive Relief (DE 12) be DENIED.”

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Incendy
95-8149-CIV · 1996-06-12
Motion to stay proceedings (defendant) Denied

“RECOMMENDS to the District Court that defendant Hedges’ motion to stay proceedings (DE 44) be DENIED.”

Restigouche, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter
91-8049-CIV-GRAHAM · 1993-12-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Town of Jupiter’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all remaining federal claims which allege arbitrary and capricious due process claims is GRANTED.”

Armor Screen Corp. v. Storm Catcher, Inc.
07-CV-81091 · 2010-03-04
Motion to disqualify counsel (defendant) Granted

“RECOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Defendants’ Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel (DE 394)”

Hamm v. TBC Corp.
07-80829-CIV · 2008-12-30
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Granted in part

“RECOMMENDS to the District Court that the Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (DE 58) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART”

Khan v. Stiffel
9:10-cv-81232 · 2011-04-18
Motion to confirm arbitration award (defendant) Granted

“GRANT Defendant’s Motions to Convert Arbitration Award to Judgment and Determine Interest Rate (DE 19 & DE 20),”

Motion to determine interest rate (defendant) Granted
Conboy v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
9:10-cv-81005 · 2011-02-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“RECOMMENDS that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 13) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (DE 12) be DISMISSED.”

Armijo v. United States
9:09-mc-81588 · 2010-05-03
Motions to dismiss (government) Granted

“GRANT the Government’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Petition to Quash Summons (DE 24)”

United States v. Korman
9:07-cv-80998 · 2009-08-14
Summary judgment (government) Granted

“United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 140), filed March 27, 2009, be GRANTED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The selected cases include criminal magistrate proceedings and civil consent matters. This targeted set does not establish her full caseload mix.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, not for Judge Vitunac: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed8,1963.4 months
Closed with no court action8483 months
Closed before pretrial7,2873.5 months
Closed during or after pretrial1610.1 months
Closed during trial4517.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20258,1963.4 months
Sep 20247,7553.6 months
Sep 202320,4080 months
Sep 20228,2873.7 months
Sep 20218,5363.2 months
Sep 20208,6573.4 months
Sep 20199,4713.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Vitunac with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Vitunac, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Vitunac's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace