Laurel M. Isicoff

How Judge Isicoff rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Status
Recalled to service
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Commissioned
February 13, 2006
Education
Barnard College, Spanish major; University of Miami School of Law, J.D. cum laude, 1982
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Isicoff

Laurel M. Isicoff became a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of Florida in 2006 and the court’s chief judge in 2016. She later served by recall. Before joining the bench, she clerked for a Florida appellate judge and practiced law for more than twenty years.

Judge Isicoff's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Isicoff, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Conferences

For Judge Isicoff’s settlement conference, the plaintiff or movant must send a written settlement demand at least ten days before the pre-settlement conference.

“at least ten (10) days prior to the pre-settlement conference, counsel for the plaintiff/movant shall submit to counsel for the defendant/respondent a written settlement demand, including an itemization of damages (if appropriate) and a brief explanation as to why such a settlement is appropriate.”

Conferences

Each party or fully authorized representative must attend Judge Isicoff’s settlement conference in person; telephone appearances are barred except in extraordinary circumstances.

“Each party shall attend the settlement conference in person, as stated in Paragraph 1, or through a duly authorized representative with complete authority to negotiate and execute a settlement agreement in such person’s discretion. JUDGE ISICOFF DOES NOT ALLOW ANY PERSON TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE EXCEPT IN EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Isicoff decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine material-fact dispute remains and the issue can be decided as a matter of law.

“Summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 7056 and 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure is appropriate when there exists no genuine issue of material fact and a decision may be rendered as a matter of law.”

Procedural preferences

Reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly.

“Reconsideration of a prior order is ‘an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly.’”

Cautions

Dischargeability deadlines remain immovable after expiration, even when a filing misses by only minutes.

“the deadline to file a complaint to determine dischargeability of debts is immovable once the deadline to file the complaint expires.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re George Walker
07-14797-LMI · 2008-04-17
Emergency motion to amend sale order (George Walker) Granted

“on March 12, 2008 I entered an Order Granting the Emergency Motion (CP #220)”

In re Christine E. Sanchez
10-23140-LMI · 2016-10-19
Trustee motion to modify or dismiss chapter 13 case (Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“I have determined that I will deny the motion to dismiss and the motion to modify.”

In re Jose Losada and Caridad Losada
10-32254-LMI · 2016-09-14
Motion to reopen case to value and determine secured status (Jose Losada and Caridad Losada) Granted in part

“The Motion to Reopen is Granted in part and Denied in part.”

In re Juan G. Martinez
17-11559-LMI · 2017-07-25
Motion to value and determine secured status (Juan G. Martinez) Denied

“The Motion to Value is DENIED.”

In re Josue Cepero and Leticia Cepero
17-20358-LMI · 2021-07-17
Amended motion for contempt for violation of court orders and automatic stay (Josue Cepero and Leticia Cepero) Granted

“the Court finds that Hammocks Community Association, Inc. (the ‘Association’) and Marglli Gallego (‘Ms. Gallego’) willfully violated this Court’s orders and violated the automatic stay.”

In re Miami Beverly, LLC, et al.
18-14506-LMI et al. · 2019-10-16
Motion to strike attorneys charging lien (Miami Development & Holdings, LLC) Granted

“The Motion to Strike is granted and the Charging Lien is hereby dissolved.”

In re Keith Andrew Smith
18-21944-LMI · 2021-05-26
Motion to dismiss or vacate conversion from chapter 11 to chapter 13 (Nancy K. Neidich, Chapter 13 trustee) Granted in part

“The Trustee’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.”

Objection to confirmation (The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee) Denied

“The Secured Creditor’s Objection is OVERRULED.”

Dillworth v. Guerra, et al.
18-11056-LMI; 20-01049-LMI · 2020-08-24
Request to strike pleadings as discovery sanction (Drew M. Dillworth) Granted

“Defendant Ivonne Perez’s pleadings are stricken;”

Request to deem requests for admission admitted (Drew M. Dillworth) Granted

“The Trustee’s/Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions [ECF No. 25], are deemed admitted for all purposes.”

Request for discovery fees and costs (Drew M. Dillworth) Granted

“the Court finds it appropriate in these circumstances to assess all fees and costs associated with the Trustee’s efforts to obtain the requested discovery”

Romay v. Mediaset España Comunicación S.A.
19-16355-LMI; 21-01059-LMI · 2025-01-03
Motion for reconsideration of summary judgment order (Mediaset España Comunicación S.A.) Denied

“The Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.”

In re Virginia Iglesias
21-17607-LMI · 2022-09-29
Motion for production of documents referenced in examiners reports (Suttongate Holdings Limited) Denied

“The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Kapila v. F1 General Trading Partners, L.P., et al.
19-22744-LMI; 20-10996-LMI; 22-01017-LMI · 2022-08-22
Motion to stay adversary proceeding (F1 General Trading Partners, L.P., et al.) Granted in part

“The Moving Defendants’ Motion for Stay is GRANTED in part.”

Gaines, as Trustee UTA dated 3/4/2019 v. Halwani, et al.
22-14810-LMI; 22-01199-LMI · 2023-03-09
Motion for summary judgment on counterclaim count i (Brian M. Gaines, as Trustee UTA dated 3/4/2019, et al.) Granted

“Summary judgment on Count I is GRANTED in favor of Lender.”

Motion for summary judgment on counterclaim count ii (Brian M. Gaines, as Trustee UTA dated 3/4/2019, et al.) Granted

“Summary judgment on Count II is GRANTED in favor of Lender.”

Motion for summary judgment on counterclaim count v (Brian M. Gaines, as Trustee UTA dated 3/4/2019, et al.) Granted

“Summary judgment on Count V is GRANTED in favor of Lender.”

Motion for summary judgment on counterclaim count vi (Brian M. Gaines, as Trustee UTA dated 3/4/2019, et al.) Granted

“Summary judgment on Count VI is GRANTED in favor of Lender.”

Draft for Judge Isicoff with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Isicoff, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Isicoff's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace