Martin A. Fitzpatrick

How Judge Fitzpatrick rules, drawn from 36 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
April 3, 2020
Education
Stetson University (B.A., Political Science); Florida State University College of Law (J.D.)
Signed orders read
36

About Judge Fitzpatrick

Martin A. Fitzpatrick joined the Northern District of Florida as a U.S. magistrate judge in April 2020, based in Tallahassee. Before joining the federal bench, he served as a judge of Florida’s Second Judicial Circuit.

Judge Fitzpatrick's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Fitzpatrick's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Fitzpatrick decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In a prisoner civil-rights case, Fitzpatrick recommended denying a motion to file an eighth amended complaint after finding that repeated changes to defendants delayed consideration of pending motions.

“His continued requests to amend are an abuse of the judicial process and are preventing this Court from adjudicating the pending motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 127 and 132, and motion to revoke in forma pauperis status, ECF No. 111.”

In Porter v. Dixon, he reviewed an unopposed summary-judgment motion on its merits rather than recommending a default grant, then recommended granting the motion.

“Despite the summary judgment motion being unopposed, it has been fully reviewed and will not be granted by default.”

In Dallas v. Summers, his report and recommendation advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file specific objections and that failing to object could waive appellate challenge to unobjected findings.

“If a party fails to object to the Magistrate Judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim or issue contained in this Report and Recommendation, that party waives the right to challenge on appeal the District Court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Porter v. Dixon
4:19-cv-00126
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 79, be GRANTED, and that current Florida Department of Corrections' Secretary Ricky D. Dixon be automatically substituted for former Secretary Mark S. Inch in his individual capacity only.”

Dallas v. Summers
1:22-cv-00186
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9) be GRANTED and the § 2254 petition (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED as untimely.”

L.R. v. Leon County School District
4:19-cv-00137
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Leon County School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 32, be GRANTED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff L.R.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 31, be DENIED”

Peterka v. Dixon
4:21-cv-00367
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, ECF No. 62, be denied and this case proceed on Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Dixon in Count I of the amended complaint, ECF No. 46.”

O'Connor v. Harris
4:21-cv-00113
Motion to vacate (plaintiff) Denied

“It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion to vacate judgment, ECF No. 16, be DENIED.”

Casey v. Proctor
4:22-cv-00069
Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an Eighth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 149, be DENIED as an abuse of the judicial process, and this case be REMANDED for further proceedings.”

Morin v. Sjostrom
4:21-cv-00335

A 13-page report and recommendation screening a pro se prisoner Section 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915 after the plaintiff's amended complaint repeated the original defects. Judge Fitzpatrick recommended sua sponte dismissal for failure to state a claim because the suit was barred by Heck v. Humphrey and Younger abstention, the named state trial judge had judicial immunity, the assistant public defender was not a state actor, and the pleading was an impermissible shotgun complaint. He also recommended that the dismissal count as a strike under Section 1915(g).

Morin v. Florida State Hospital
4:22-cv-00406

A 3-page report and recommendation recommending sua sponte dismissal of a pro se prisoner suit for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order: after being granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed to file a second amended complaint, the plaintiff let the deadline pass despite a warning, appearing to have abandoned the case.

Roberts v. Bisignano
4:24-cv-00366 · 2025-09-29
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Considering the record as a whole, the findings of the ALJ are based upon substantial evidence in the record and the ALJ correctly applied the law. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application for Social Security Disability Benefits is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the Commissioner.”

Soileau v. Board of Pilot Commissioners
4:25-cv-00217-RH-MAF · 2026-07-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the reasons discussed, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 43, be GRANTED and Plaintiff’s amended complaint be DISMISSED based on Eleventh Amendment immunity.”

Pesqueira v. Bisignano
5:25-cv-00144-MAF · 2026-08-31
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“After consideration of the record, for the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.”

Greene v. State of Florida
4:25-cv-00466-MW-MAF · 2026-04-29
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) be GRANTED and the § 2254 petition (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Judge Fitzpatrick's directly assigned and consent docket is dominated by Social Security disability appeals, alongside magistrate criminal-duty matters and occasional civil-rights or consumer cases. Much of his additional work consists of reports and recommendations in referred prisoner civil-rights, state-habeas, and other civil matters, which are not reflected in the assigned-case mix.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, not for Judge Fitzpatrick: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed148,42847.7 months
Closed with no court action303 months
Closed before pretrial148,38547.7 months
Closed during or after pretrial4not reported
Closed during trial9not reported
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 2025148,42847.7 months
Sep 2024140,47943.4 months
Sep 202336,30727.8 months
Sep 202257,84521.8 months
Sep 202114,9725.3 months
Sep 20206,0386.7 months
Sep 20191,1487.5 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Fitzpatrick with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Fitzpatrick, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Fitzpatrick's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace