Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

How Judge Kahn rules, drawn from 8 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
March 4, 2011
Education
University of Florida College of Law, J.D., 1977
Signed orders read
8

About Judge Kahn

Charles J. Kahn Jr. serves as a U.S. magistrate judge for the Northern District of Florida in Pensacola. Before joining the federal bench in 2011, he served on Florida’s First District Court of Appeal.

Judge Kahn's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Kahn's own (checked October 9, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Kahn decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, Kahn recommended dismissing a Section 2254 petition for lack of jurisdiction because it was a second or successive application filed without authorization from the court of appeals.

“the petition is an unauthorized ‘second or successive’ habeas corpus application under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); that petitioner failed to obtain the requisite authorization before filing this petition; and that this case should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”

In Roberts v. Turner, Kahn recommended dismissing the pro se civil-rights complaint without prejudice after finding that its deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. He cited the Eleventh Circuit rule requiring an opportunity to amend when a more carefully drafted complaint might state a claim.

“Generally, ‘a district court must grant a plaintiff at least one opportunity to amend their claims before dismissing them if it appears a more carefully drafted complaint might state a claim upon which relief can be granted even if the plaintiff never seeks leave to amend.’”

In Eaton v. Bank of New York Mellon, Kahn recommended granting the defendant's statutory fee request. Although the underlying action had been dismissed without prejudice, he found the defendant was the prevailing party because the plaintiffs could not refile successfully; he rejected a separate contractual-fee theory.

“despite the dismissal without prejudice, I have found that BoNYM is the prevailing party because Eaton could not refile successfully.”

Cautions

In Rodriguez v. Unknown Medical Staff, Kahn recommended dismissing claims against two defendants without prejudice for failure to state a claim while directing service on the remaining medical-provider defendant.

“It appears that service on the third defendant, unknown medical staff at Centurion Health Care Provider (‘Centurion’), is appropriate.”

In Odom v. Florida Department of Corrections, Kahn recommended dismissing the prisoner’s third amended complaint with prejudice after finding no plausible claim under the ADA or the First, Eighth, or Fourteenth Amendments. He found the retaliation claim speculative on causation.

“Here, plaintiff’s retaliation claim fails on the element of causation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
3:15-cv-00512-RV-CJK · 2016-11-28
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“That respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 15) be GRANTED. That the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) ... be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, as an unauthorized second or successive habeas corpus application.”

Pease v. Jones
3:15-cv-00068-MCR-CJK · 2015-10-02
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“That respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 16) be GRANTED. That the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 6) be DISMISSED as moot.”

Simmons v. Jones
3:14-cv-00374-MCR-CJK · 2015-06-26
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“That respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 16) be GRANTED. That the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) ... be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

Roberts v. Turner
3:17-cv-00355-MCR-CJK · 2017-06-21
Screening dismissal (court) Granted

“That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.”

Rodriguez v. Unknown Medical Staff at Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
3:16-cv-00253-LC-CJK · 2018-02-05
Screening dismissal (court) Granted in part

“That plaintiff's claims against Tallahassee Memorial Hospital and Julie Jones be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. That the clerk of court be directed to update the docket to reflect the sole remaining defendant, Unknown Medical Staff at Centurion Health Care Provider.”

Odom v. Florida Department of Corrections
3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK · 2011-10-17
Screening dismissal (court) Granted

“That this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”

United States v. Blair
3:12-cr-00005-LAC · 2012-02-22

A Rule 11 Report and Recommendation concerning a guilty plea rather than a party motion. After a plea colloquy, Kahn found the defendant's plea to a thirty-seven-count indictment knowing and voluntary with an independent factual basis, and recommended that the plea be accepted and the defendant adjudicated guilty. Grounding quote in notes.

Eaton v. The Bank of New York Mellon
3:21-cv-00251 · 2021-09-28
Motion for attorneys fees (defendant) Granted

“That the court GRANT Defendant ‘BoNYM’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees’ (ECF No. 46), for the reasons set out herein.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • From 2011 through 2018, Judge Kahn's assigned civil docket was dominated by consent Social Security disability appeals, with additional ADA, employment, prisoner civil-rights, wage, copyright, contract, and property disputes.
  • Among thirty reviewed cases, durations ranged from 72 to 1,219 days with a median near 278 days.
  • Social Security appeals clustered more tightly, while prisoner civil-rights matters produced the longest cases, including one consent jury trial.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, not for Judge Kahn: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed148,42847.7 months
Closed with no court action303 months
Closed before pretrial148,38547.7 months
Closed during or after pretrial4not reported
Closed during trial9not reported
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 2025148,42847.7 months
Sep 2024140,47943.4 months
Sep 202336,30727.8 months
Sep 202257,84521.8 months
Sep 202114,9725.3 months
Sep 20206,0386.7 months
Sep 20191,1487.5 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Kahn with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Kahn, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Kahn's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace