William Terrell Hodges

How Judge Hodges rules, drawn from 6 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hodges no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Status
Retired 2022
Served
1971–2022
Appointed by
Richard Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
1971-12-15
Education
University of Florida (B.S.B.A., 1956); University of Florida College of Law, now the Fredric G. Levin College of Law (J.D., 1958)
Signed orders read
6

How Judge Hodges decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Cincinnati Insurance, the court granted the insurer's two summary-judgment motions and denied the insureds' two cross-motions after the underlying liability case reached a verdict.

“ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company's Motion for summary judgment; denying 39 Defendants' Motion for summary judgment; granting 55 Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment; denying 59 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges on 5/13/2016.”

At the pleading stage in American Home Assurance, the court declined to choose governing law or resolve limitations questions where the complaint did not establish where the challenged conduct, injury, and relationship were centered.

“At this stage of the litigation, the record is insufficient to determine precisely where the injury-causing conduct occurred. It is also impossible to determine precisely where the parties’ relationship was centered.”

In Robbins, the court rejected a claim-splitting argument because the parallel state and federal actions involved different defendants and the manufacturer had not shown privity.

“While Florida law may be silent on mutuality of parties, the federal claim splitting doctrine clearly requires identity of parties — and in particular identity of defendants.”

In Myers, conflicting testimony about whether an employment relationship had formed prevented summary judgment on the bankruptcy-discrimination termination claim.

“Such determinations are for the ultimate trier of fact, not for the Court at summary judgment.”

In Snipes, the court treated juror emails about deliberations and pretrial assumptions as internal jury-process evidence rather than an outside influence that could support post-verdict interviews.

“It follows that the Court cannot consider the emails of the jurors — indeed, they could not be considered even if they were proffered under oath in affidavit form.”

In White Construction, the court enforced the written mining agreement against several oral-contract and equitable theories while preserving claims for which the parties' evidence created material factual disputes.

“The Court further concludes that material issues of fact remain in dispute as to at least three of the elements of the Plaintiffs’ claim.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Quorum Management Corp.
5:12-cv-406-Oc-10PRL · 2016-05-13
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company's Motion for summary judgment;”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“denying 39 Defendants' Motion for summary judgment;”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“granting 55 Plaintiff's Motion for summary judgment;”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“denying 59 Defendant's Motion for summary judgment.”

American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.
5:10-cv-00329 · 2011-03-01
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Beacon Industrial Staffing, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 11) is DENIED.”

Robbins v. General Motors de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
5:09-cv-00287 · 2011-09-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant, General Motors De Mexico, S. DE R.L. DE CV.’s Motion to Dismiss or, In the Alternative, Motion to Stay (Doc. 15) is DENIED.”

Myers v. TooJay's Management Corp.
5:08-cv-00365 · 2009-10-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant TooJay’s Management Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) is DENIED.”

United States v. Snipes
5:06-cr-00022 · 2010-11-19
Motion for permission to interview jurors (defendant) Denied

“The motion for permission to interview jurors (Doc. 527) and the second motion for leave to interview jurors (Doc. 530), are both DENIED.”

Motion for permission to interview jurors (defendant) Denied
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“The amended motion for a new trial (Doc. 541) is, in all respects, DENIED.”

Motion to revoke bail (government) Granted

“The motion of the United States to revoke bail (Doc. 526) is GRANTED”

Motion for bail (defendant) Denied

“the Defendant’s Motion for Bail Pending Rule 33 Motion (Doc. 529) is DENIED.”

White Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
5:05-cv-00328 · 2009-04-07
Summary judgment (defendants) Granted in part

“The Defendants’ Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Doc. 80) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.”

Motions to dismiss (defendants) Moot / procedural

“The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 50) is DENIED AS MOOT”

Motion for status conference (both parties) Moot / procedural

“The Parties’ Joint Motions for Status Conference (Docs. 210-211) are DENIED AS MOOT”

A historical record

Judge Hodges no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.